AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › Gallup Access · October 2026 Edition
Gallup · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Gallup Access

3Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
2 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Gallup Access was named 1 time in Employee engagement surv, where Culture Amp led with 37%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In employee engagement surv · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Gallup Access for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Employee engagement surveysOnboarding and employee experience0%55 of 58100%1under 10 labels · led by Culture Amp at 37%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Gallup Access held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Employee engagement surv · by segment

Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 38 of 118, unchanged
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 39 → 51 of 53
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 63 → 54 of 96

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Employee engagement surv0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 39 → 55 of 58

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Gallup Access across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500011
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 label1not counted in share
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Great if you want their proven Q12 methodology, but more expensive” MiniMax M2.5 · Employee engagement surv · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Gallup Access, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Gallup Access was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Culture Amp3 of 31Not among the top eight
15Five Engage2 of 30Not among the top eight
Lattice2 of 30Not among the top eight
Qualtrics EmployeeXM2 of 30Not among the top eight
SurveyMonkey2 of 30Not among the top eight
Bonusly1 of 30Not among the top eight
Medallia1 of 30Not among the top eight
Microsoft Viva Glint1 of 30Not among the top eight
Motivosity1 of 30Not among the top eight
WorkTango1 of 30Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Gallup Access. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 3 answers that named Gallup Access and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

15five.com1
bonusly.com1
cultureamp.com1
gallup.comYour site1
motivosity.com1
people.lattice.com1
resources.worktango.com1
success.15five.com1

Seven of the eight domain citations in answers naming Gallup Access came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on gallup.com
1,506
subdomains included
Content
571
counted in the table below
Documentation
2
Product · Integration
355 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
News or press510162026-09-28
Report or ebook3802019-12-20
Blog602025-03-05
Glossary or explainer602010-05-21
Podcast or video502022-01-18
Case study402024-01-30
Conference or event1undated
Comparison1undated

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page gallup.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Gallup Access

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Gallup Access; a claim can dispute any of them.
Gallup 1

Follow Gallup Access

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Gallup is the company behind Gallup Access.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
our workplace performance platform
For
organizations
Certifications
SOC 2 Type 2SOC 3TX-RAMP Level 2ISO/IEC 27001:2022ISO/IEC 27701:2019EU-US DPFSwiss-US DPFUK Extension to EU-US DPF
Hosting
Amazon Web Services (AWS) US East Region (Northern Virginia, USA)Microsoft Azure US Central Region (Iowa)Amazon Web Services (AWS) EU Central Region (Frankfurt, Germany)Microsoft Azure North Europe Region (Ireland)Amazon Web Services (AWS) EU West Region (Ireland)
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, customers

What Gallup Access's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: gallup.com, trust.gallup.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Gallup Access's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Gallup Access, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Gallup Access by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Gallup Access is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Gallup Access, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at gallup.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.