Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 57 → 38 of 44
2 categories · Named, not rankedFloatMe
6Judge labels
0First choices
6Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. FloatMe was named 5 times in Earned wage access and 1 other category, where Tapcheck led with 38%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market49 of 54
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise43 of 55
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In earned wage access · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named FloatMe for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earned wage access | Compensation and total rewards | 0% | 49 of 54 | 100% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Tapcheck at 38% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Financial wellness platforms | Compensation and total rewards | 0% | 103 of 117 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by LearnLux at 24% |
Movement
Since September 2026, FloatMe held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Earned wage access · by segment
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 40 of 53, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earned wage access | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 57 → 49 of 54 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated FloatMe across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated FloatMe across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative6 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Sued by the FTC, resulting in a $3 million settlement to refund customers, followed by subsequent class-action lawsuits.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Earned wage access · negative prompt · hard negative
“Named in litigation; courts have rejected claims that it's not offering loans” Kimi K2 · Earned wage access · negative prompt · hard negative
“The FTC said the company misrepresented cash advances, made cancellation difficult, and denied advances to some people” GPT-6 Luna · Financial wellness · negative prompt · soft negative
“named in the same report as direct-to-borrower EWA with similar concerns” Muse Glimmer 30B · Earned wage access · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as FloatMe, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and FloatMe was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as FloatMe, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and FloatMe was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named FloatMe. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 6 answers that named FloatMe and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
files.consumerfinance.gov3
ftc.gov3
nclc.org3
responsiblelending.org3
sheppard.com3
g2.com2
gusto.com2
kansascityfed.org2
library.nclc.org2
neweconomyproject.org2
Twenty-five of the twenty-five domain citations in answers naming FloatMe came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
float.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, FloatMe takes 0% of first choices and Tapcheck takes 38%.ShowHide
Search and answers
float.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, FloatMe takes 0% of first choices and Tapcheck takes 38%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “earned wage access provider”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “earned wage access providers”
–
not in the top ten
- Organic visits to its site
- about 38,659 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 6,849 · 257 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 3,108
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 49 of 54 in earned wage access
Segment leader
38%
Tapcheck
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 6 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 6 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on float.com
741
subdomains included
Content
328
counted in the table below
Documentation
210
Product · Integration
6 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 274 | 0 | 2026-06-05 | ||
| Conference or event | 19 | 0 | 2025-11-04 | ||
| Case study | 18 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 6 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 6 | 3 | 2026-09-14 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 4 | 0 | 2025-08-21 | ||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-14Float vs psa comparison
- 2026-09-09Resource management software build vibe code vs buy comparison
- 2026-09-07Spreadsheet vs resource management software comparison
- 2026-06-0511 best resource management tools to power your projects in 2026 blog
- 2026-04-30Reporting and forecasting in float blog
- 2026-04-07The first spark: what we learned during our first Hackathon blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page float.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow FloatMe
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
FloatMe is its own company.ShowHide
The company
FloatMe is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- #1 solution for profitable resource management
- For
- professional services teams globally
- Price stated
- Starter: $7.00 USD per scheduled person/month; Pro: $12.00 USD per scheduled person/month; Enterprise: Let's talk float.com/pricing
- Starting price
- $7.00 USD per scheduled person/month float.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Free 30-day trial float.com
- Integrations claimed
- 5 float.com/pricing
- Certifications
- B Corp certifiedGDPR & SOC2 compliantSOC 2 Type IB-Corp CertifiedGDPR
- Customers named
- 4,500+ teams schedule client work with FloatAndrew BardenEmma HarrisMaike JahnensVeronica CàceresJapie StoppelenburgEmily FelicianoMartin Mattli
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting
What FloatMe's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: float.com, float.com/pricing, trust.float.com, float.com/product/scheduling, float.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when FloatMe's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as FloatMe, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for FloatMe by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where FloatMe is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name FloatMe, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.