AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › eSkill · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Named, not ranked

eSkill

23Judge labels
0First choices
4Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
8 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. eSkill was named 8 times in Candidate assessment and 1 other category, where TestGorilla led with 52%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In candidate assessment · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named eSkill for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Candidate assessmentTalent acquisition0%22 of 11814%7under 10 labels · led by TestGorilla at 52%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Technical hiring assessmentsTalent acquisition0%66 of 71100%1under 10 labels · led by HackerRank at 17%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, eSkill held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Candidate assessment · by segment

Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 16 of 80, unchanged
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 58 → 25 of 115
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 22 → 20 of 67

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Candidate assessment0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 58 → 22 of 118
Technical hiring assessm0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 48 → 66 of 71

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated eSkill across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00112
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash02002
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00011
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B02002

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labelsNone
Paraphrase7 labelsNone
Comparative6 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative23 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“eSkill is a pre-employment assessment platform focused on hiring confidence and structured candidate evaluation.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Candidate assessment · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“gives customizable skills checks and behavioral checks tailored to numerous industries and job roles” Muse Glimmer 30B · Candidate assessment · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best for: Small-to-medium businesses needing standardized skills tests” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Candidate assessment · comparative prompt · alternative
“eSkill — *Best for Customizable, Role-Specific Testing*” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Candidate assessment · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Outdated Question Banks: These platforms often feature older technologies” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Technical hiring assessm · negative prompt · soft negative
“Requires sales contact; less transparent” Grok 4.1 Fast · Candidate assessment · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as eSkill, over the 23 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and eSkill was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
TestGorilla18 of 239Not among the top eight
Criteria Corp13 of 234Not among the top eight
HackerRank13 of 232Not among the top eight
Codility12 of 231Not among the top eight
iMocha8 of 232Not among the top eight
HireVue8 of 230Not among the top eight
Vervoe7 of 231Not among the top eight
Mercer | Mettl7 of 230Not among the top eight
CodeSignal6 of 230Not among the top eight
TestDome5 of 231Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named eSkill. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 22 of the 23 answers that named eSkill and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

bryq.com13
testgorilla.com13
g2.com10
greenhouse.com9
guideflow.com9
testlify.com9
getapp.com7
gitnux.org7
hackerrank.com7
hiretruffle.com7

Ninety-one of the ninety-one domain citations in answers naming eSkill came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

eskill.com ranks first on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, eSkill takes 0% of first choices and TestGorilla takes 52%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “assessment platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “pre-employment assessment platform”
1
Searches for its name, Google
720 a month (“eskill”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
74 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 16,072 a month
Searches its site ranks for
3,372 · 163 in the top three
Sites linking to it
1,841
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
68 ads · 42 text, 21 image, 5 video · 31 shown in the last 30 days

First shown December 2024, as eSkill Corporation, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 52 in the year, 16 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 22 of 118 in candidate assessment
Segment leader
52%
TestGorilla
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
23 answers
Its own site cited
in 22 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on eskill.com
1,186
subdomains included
Content
416
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
17 · 115
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog261122026-09-21Employee onboarding, Workforce planning
Case study6302019-04-10
Glossary or explainer5812026-09-01Applicant tracking syste
Webinar or virtual event16undated
Comparison1492026-08-31
Template or tool202025-08-13
Conference or event102026-06-22
News or press1undated

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page eskill.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow eSkill

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

eSkill is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
the ai-powered assessment platform
For
businesses
Integrations claimed
45 eskill.com/integrations
Customers named
Alliance Nationwide ExpositionGEPrince George's CountyCCRICharger LogisticsGE VernovaVatica HealthBELAY
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, certifications, hosting

What eSkill's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: eskill.com, eskill.com/platform-features, eskill.com/resources/case-studies, eskill.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when eSkill's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as eSkill, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for eSkill by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where eSkill is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name eSkill, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at eskill.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.