Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 16 → 22 of 115
Mercer · 2 categories · RankedMercer | Mettl
44Judge labels
1First choices
8Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Candidate assessment for enterprise buyers
Rank 23 of 118 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 22% of its 9 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market23 of 118
0%9 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise9 of 75
2%20 labels
accepted challenger
In candidate assessment · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Mercer | Mettl for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Candidate assessment | Talent acquisition | 0% | 23 of 118 | 22% | 9 | under 10 labels · led by TestGorilla at 52% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Technical hiring assessments | Talent acquisition | 0% | 65 of 71 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by HackerRank at 17% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Mercer | Mettl held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Candidate assessment · by segment
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 3% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 3% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 10 → 9 of 67
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Candidate assessment | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 16 → 23 of 118 |
| Technical hiring assessm | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 22 → 65 of 71 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Mercer | Mettl across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Mercer | Mettl across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct11 labels1
Paraphrase4 labelsNone
Comparative23 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative5 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative44 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“TestGorilla or Mercer Mettl are top choices” Mistral Small · Candidate assessment · comparative prompt · first choice
“Best for enterprise-style psychometrics and high-volume structured assessment: Mercer Mettl” GPT-5.4 mini · Candidate assessment · direct prompt · alternative
“Enterprise-wide hiring & talent programs → Mercer | Mettl or eSkill” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Candidate assessment · comparative prompt · alternative
“high-volume campus hiring points to Mercer Mettl” Muse Glimmer 30B · Technical hiring assessm · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Mercer Mettl ⚠️ MIXED REVIEWS ... Risk: $500+ losses reported with refund refusals” Kimi K2 · Candidate assessment · negative prompt · soft negative
“it's less specialized for coding depth than the technical-first tools above” GPT-5.4 mini · Technical hiring assessm · direct prompt · soft negative
“Strong validation, but often overkill/heavier for mid-market” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Candidate assessment · direct prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Mercer | Mettl, over the 44 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Mercer | Mettl was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Mercer | Mettl, over the 44 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Mercer | Mettl was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Mercer | Mettl. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 42 of the 44 answers that named Mercer | Mettl and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
testgorilla.com20
testlify.com17
guideflow.com16
bryq.com14
worldmetrics.org14
g2.com12
hackerrank.com12
codility.com10
gitnux.org10
testtrick.com10
135 of the 135 domain citations in answers naming Mercer | Mettl came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
mettl.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Mercer | Mettl takes 0% of first choices and TestGorilla takes 52%.ShowHide
Search and answers
mettl.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Mercer | Mettl takes 0% of first choices and TestGorilla takes 52%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “assessment platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “pre-employment assessment platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- not counted (“mercer | mettl”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 44 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 23,566 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 7,216 · 103 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 4,624
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 23 of 118 in candidate assessment
Segment leader
52%
TestGorilla
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 44 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 42 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on mettl.com
2,022
subdomains included
Content
610
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 540 | 11 | 2026-08-13 | Succession planning, 360 feedback | |
| Report or ebook | 48 | 0 | 2026-04-22 | Succession planning | |
| News or press | 8 | undated | Applicant tracking syste | ||
| Comparison | 7 | 0 | 2025-09-19 | ||
| Conference or event | 3 | 0 | 2024-05-31 | ||
| Case study | 2 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 1 | 0 | 2025-05-08 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | 0 | 2021-03-23 |
Most recent
- 2026-08-13En ae blog
- 2026-08-12How psychometrics improve culture fit hiring in the philippines blog
- 2026-08-11Preparing organizations for human ai agility redesigning work skills and leadership blog
- 2026-08-11Ai assisted software development performance metric blog
- 2026-08-05Rethinking ai adoption agility over skills blog
- 2026-07-30Ultimate guide listing blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page mettl.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Mercer | Mettl
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Mercer | Mettl; a claim can dispute any of them.
Mercer Mettl 8
Follow Mercer | Mettl
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Mercer is the company behind Mercer | Mettl.ShowHide
The company
Mercer is the company behind Mercer | Mettl.
ShowHideOn record
Company recordsIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Best Talent Assessment Company - Online Tools & Software Platform | Mercer | Mettl
- For
- Academic Institutes and Corporates
- Free plan or trial
- Take a Free Demo; Get a Free Trial; TRY FOR FREE mettl.com
- Certifications
- ISO 27001 CertifiedISO9001 CertifiedSOC2 Type 2GDPR ReadyBPS REGISTERED TEST
- Hosting
- EuropeIndiaChina
- Customers named
- AIMAIVPThe Washington CenterIIMBModern FoodsEBZ Business SchoolAmazonTVS Motor Group
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, integrations
What Mercer | Mettl's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: mettl.com, mettl.com/talent-analytics/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Mercer | Mettl's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Mercer | Mettl, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Mercer | Mettl by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Mercer | Mettl is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Mercer | Mettl, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.