Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 53 of 117, unchanged
1 category · Named, not rankedEquip
7Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Equip was named 1 time in Skills intelligence, where Skills Base led with 18%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market55 of 127
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In skills intelligence · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Equip for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skills intelligence | Performance and talent management | 0% | 55 of 127 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Skills Base at 18% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Equip held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Skills intelligence · by segment
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skills intelligence | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 55 of 127, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Equip across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Equip across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Equip: $1 per candidate — ideal for very low‑volume or sporadic hiring.” Kimi K2 · Skills intelligence · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Equip, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Equip was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Equip, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Equip was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Equip. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 7 answers that named Equip and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
bryq.com6
testtrick.com5
hr-ai-index.com4
firsthr.app3
getyogen.com3
testlify.com3
capterra.com2
fitsmallbusiness.com2
g2.com2
guideflow.com2
Thirty-two of the thirty-two domain citations in answers naming Equip came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on equip.co
737
subdomains included
Content
277
counted in the table below
Documentation
107
Product · Integration
25 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 209 | 2 | 2026-09-04 | ||
| Comparison | 43 | 0 | 2026-06-16 | ||
| Case study | 24 | 0 | 2024-07-17 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-04Moving to subscription pricing blog
- 2026-07-03Can candidates game your psychometric tests blog
- 2026-06-16Ai hiring agents vs agent washing comparison
- 2026-02-06From resume parsing to job offer complete candidate journey blog
- 2026-02-05Resume parsing software for startups affordable solutions guide blog
- 2026-02-04Conversational ai interviews vs traditional phone screens whats better comparison
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page equip.co exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Equip
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Equip is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Equip is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Equip helps recruiters spend less time filtering resumes and more time engaging great candidates. Our tools—an AI-native ATS with built-in resume screening, assessments, and AI interviews—make hiring both faster and fairer.
- For
- HR Managers, Recruiters, Hiring Teams, Startups, Universities, Founders, CHRO.HRBP, Talent Partners, Talent Acquisition Managers
- Price stated
- $1 per candidate, Pay-per-candidate, volume discounts available equip.co
- Starting price
- $1 per candidate equip.co
- Free plan or trial
- Start free today equip.co
- Certifications
- GDPR complianceSOC 2 compliance
- Customers named
- PractoTreebo HotelsShadowfaxWiproCiplaDunkin' DonutsKotak SecuritiesDelhivery
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, hosting
What Equip's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: equip.co, equip.co/pricing, equip.co/features, equip.co/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Equip's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Equip, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Equip by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Equip is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Equip, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.