Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 6 → 9 of 80
2 categories · RankedTestlify
45Judge labels
3First choices
2Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Candidate assessment for mid-market buyers
Rank 8 of 118 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 8% of its 12 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Testlify →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business10 of 80
0%14 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market8 of 118
2%12 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise21 of 75
0%7 labels
under the label threshold
In candidate assessment · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Testlify for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Candidate assessment | Talent acquisition | 2% | 8 of 118 | 8% | 12 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Technical hiring assessments | Talent acquisition | 0% | 17 of 71 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by HackerRank at 17% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Testlify held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Candidate assessment · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 4 → 8 of 115
Enterprise▼−3Since September 2026: 3% → 0%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 3% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 13 → 23 of 67
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Candidate assessment | 2% | 2% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 4 → 8 of 118 |
| Technical hiring assessm | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 47 → 17 of 71 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Testlify across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Testlify across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labelsNone
Paraphrase7 labels1
Comparative13 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained12 labels2
Scale-constrained4 labelsNone
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative45 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Testlify is the clearest pick from these results because it combines a very low entry price with a large test library” Perplexity Sonar · Candidate assessment · budget prompt · first choice
“Testlify adds AI-scored technical assessments and anti-cheating proctoring” Perplexity Sonar · Technical hiring assessm · comparative prompt · alternative
“Focuses on realistic, job-specific tasks... Good for evaluating practical skills.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Technical hiring assessm · negative prompt · alternative
“TestGorilla / Testlify (Versatile for technical + non-technical skills)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Technical hiring assessm · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“starts at $198/month, but a bit pricier” GPT-5.4 mini · Candidate assessment · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Testlify, over the 45 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Testlify was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Testlify, over the 45 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Testlify was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Testlify. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 45 of the 45 answers that named Testlify and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
testgorilla.com24
testlify.comYour site21
g2.com19
firsthr.app16
fitsmallbusiness.com14
testtrick.com14
bryq.com13
hiretruffle.com13
hirevire.com13
peoplemanagingpeople.com12
138 of the 159 domain citations in answers naming Testlify came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
testlify.com ranks 8 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Testlify takes 2% of first choices and TestGorilla takes 52%.ShowHide
Search and answers
testlify.com ranks 8 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Testlify takes 2% of first choices and TestGorilla takes 52%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “assessment platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “pre-employment assessment platform”
8
- Searches for its name, Google
- 480 a month (“testlify”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 6 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 43,586 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 19,484 · 151 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,788
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess1 ads · 1 text · 0 shown in the last 30 days
First shown October 2025, as Testlify, Inc, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 1 in the year.
On Google's pages: 1
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 8 of 118 in candidate assessment
Segment leader
52%
TestGorilla
- First choices
- 3 across its categories
- Named in
- 45 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 45 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on testlify.com
736
subdomains included
Content
158
counted in the table below
Documentation
435
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 80 | undated | Candidate assessment, Applicant tracking syste | ||
| Case study | 48 | 13 | 2026-07-27 | ||
| Comparison | 15 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 6 | undated | |||
| News or press | 6 | 0 | 2026-05-20 | ||
| Report or ebook | 2 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-07-27Customer success stories case study
- 2026-07-27Ashesi university case study
- 2026-07-27Infojini case study
- 2026-07-27Benore logistics case study
- 2026-07-25Navan case study
- 2026-07-25Cci consulting case study
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page testlify.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Testlify
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Testlify is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Testlify is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI-native skills assessment and interviewing platform
- For
- Hiring teams, talent teams, recruiters
- Price stated
- Free trial; Monthly Subscription; Annual Subscription testlify.com
- Starting price
- 0 testlify.com
- Free plan or trial
- 7-day free trial; Testlify Free 14-days Trial Subscription testlify.com
- Integrations claimed
- 100 testlify.com
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type 2ISO 27001EEOCEFPACCPAGDPR
- Customers named
- xneeloKimp.ioEndiprevPiccadilly Estates
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting
What Testlify's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: testlify.com, trust.testlify.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Testlify's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Testlify, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Testlify by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Testlify is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Testlify, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.