Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 23 → 16 of 82
1 category · RankedEnboarder
48Judge labels
8First choices
7Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
12% in Employee onboarding for enterprise buyers
Rank 15 of 87 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 8% of its 13 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Enboarder →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business16 of 92
2%8 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market15 of 87
0%13 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise2 of 113
12%26 labels
accepted challenger
In employee onboarding · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Enboarder for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Employee onboarding | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 15 of 87 | 8% | 13 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Enboarder held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Employee onboarding · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 13 → 14 of 80
Enterprise▲+3Since September 2026: 5% → 8%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
8%from 5% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 3 → 4 of 106
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Employee onboarding | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 13 → 15 of 87 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Enboarder across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Enboarder across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct8 labels3
Paraphrase8 labels3
Comparative17 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained4 labelsNone
Scale-constrained5 labels2
Negative6 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative48 labels in all, every segment counted; 8 of the 10 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Enboarder is more relevant if your priority is designing richer, personalized onboarding journeys” GPT-6 Luna · Employee onboarding · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Choose Enboarder if you already have an HR system and mainly want a better onboarding experience” Perplexity Sonar · Employee onboarding · comparative prompt · alternative
“Focuses on personalized, experience-driven onboarding to improve retention and engagement.” Mistral Small · Employee onboarding · comparative prompt · alternative
“Want to dramatically improve the new-hire *experience* and engagement? → Enboarder” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Employee onboarding · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Pricier ($29K+/year); maybe overkill if you have <100 hires/year” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Employee onboarding · scale prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Enboarder, over the 48 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Enboarder was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Enboarder, over the 48 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Enboarder was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Enboarder. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 43 of the 48 answers that named Enboarder and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
peoplemanagingpeople.com26
hrcloud.com20
screenapp.io14
personio.com13
zapier.com13
darwinbox.com12
paycor.com12
rippling.com12
forbes.com10
hr.software10
142 of the 142 domain citations in answers naming Enboarder came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
enboarder.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Enboarder takes 0% of first choices and Rippling takes 25%.ShowHide
Search and answers
enboarder.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Enboarder takes 0% of first choices and Rippling takes 25%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “onboarding platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “employee onboarding software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 590 a month (“enboarder”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 7 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 23,446 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 2,984 · 374 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,675
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 15 of 87 in employee onboarding
Segment leader
25%
Rippling
- First choices
- 8 across its categories
- Named in
- 48 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 43 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on enboarder.com
598
subdomains included
Content
378
counted in the table below
Documentation
153
Product · Integration
2 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 279 | 23 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 58 | 1 | 2026-08-24 | ||
| Case study | 13 | 0 | 2026-05-21 | ||
| Template or tool | 10 | 1 | 2026-07-31 | ||
| Conference or event | 9 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 5 | 2 | 2026-07-14 | ||
| Report or ebook | 3 | 1 | 2026-07-04 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28High volume hiring hr guide blog
- 2026-09-24Ai onboarding adoption trends blog
- 2026-09-15Sap intelligent onboarding partner blog
- 2026-09-15Enterprise onboarding guide blog
- 2026-09-15Stackone blog
- 2026-09-10Recruiting data quality gap blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page enboarder.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Enboarder
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Enboarder is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Enboarder is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The AI Orchestration Layer for the Employee Lifecycle
- For
- CHROs, CFOs, HR teams, IT and managers
- Price stated
- We don’t have one-size-fits-all pricing—your quote is tailored to your company and goals. enboarder.com/pricing
- Integrations claimed
- 85 enboarder.com/pricing · 200 enboarder.com/platform-overview · 100 enboarder.com/lp/partners pages disagree
- Certifications
- SOC 2ISO 27001GDPR
- Hosting
- Asia PacificCanadaEuropeAmericas
- Customers named
- DeloitteINGT-MobileCiscoHugo BossTomTomLandor & FitchLonza
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, free plan or trial
What Enboarder's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: enboarder.com, enboarder.com/pricing, enboarder.com/trust, enboarder.com/platform-overview, enboarder.com/lp/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Enboarder's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Enboarder, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Enboarder by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Enboarder is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Enboarder, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.