AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Talent acquisition › Technical hiring assessm › CoderPad vs Codility
Technical hiring assessments · October 2026 Edition

CoderPad vs Codility

One of fourteen models named CoderPad first on the direct prompt; three named Codility. Both were named by all fourteen models and CoderPad carries 52 labels and Codility 53, so the shares are not directly comparable.

CoderPad

accepted challenger

Named in three categories this edition.

Codility

accepted challenger

Named in three categories this edition.

First-choice share10%9%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate6%25%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#6A position in a field of 9; printed, not drawn.
Labels5253A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, CoderPad reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.HackerRank was named alongside these two in ten of the fourteen direct answers. HackerRank vs CoderPad · HackerRank vs Codility · CodeSignal vs CoderPad

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the technical hiring assessments page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
CoderPadFirst choices, of fourteen modelsCodility
Direct132 against Codility
Paraphrase411 against Codility
Comparative12
Budget-constrained002 against Codility
Scale-constrained11
Negative603 against CoderPad · 8 against Codility
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, CoderPad and Codility were named in the same answer 102 times, of the 142 answers naming CoderPad and the 212 naming Codility. In those answers Codility took the first choice thirteen times and CoderPad sixteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where CoderPad and Codility stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
CoderPad Codility first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, CoderPad on the left and Codility on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where CoderPad and Codility stood in it.

CoderPad first, Codility not the choice

1 of 14 modelsCodility was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Gemini 3.5 FlashCoderPad, Woven alternatives: CodeSignal

Codility first, CoderPad an alternative

3 of 14 modelsCoderPad was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
DeepSeek V4 FlashCodility alternatives: CodeSignal, HackerRank
GLM 4.7 FlashXCodility, TestGorilla alternatives: CodeSignal, Coderbyte, HackerRank
MiniMax M2.5Codility alternatives: AssessHub, CoderPad, HackerRank

Neither was the first choice, one was named

5 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniHackerRank alternatives: CodeSignal, Codility
Grok 4.1 FastHackerRank alternatives: CodeSignal, CoderPad, Coderbyte, Codility
Qwen 3.7 FlashCodeSignal alternatives: CoderPad, Codility, TestGorilla, Voomer
GPT-6 LunaCodeSignal Hire Grow alternatives: CoderPad, HackerRank
Muse Glimmer 30BCodeSignal, DevSkiller, HackerRank alternatives: Codility

Neither was named

5 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5HackerEarth, TestGorilla alternatives: CodeSignal
Perplexity SonarCodeSignal alternatives: Coderbyte, DevSkiller
Mistral SmallGoodfit alternatives: HackerRank
Llama 4 MaverickGoodfit alternatives: CodeSignal, Coderbyte, HackerRank
Kimi K2Coderbyte alternatives: HackerRank, TestGorilla

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
CoderPad leads by fourteen points.
CoderPad17%#2 of 8
Codility3%#7 of 8
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
CoderPad leads by two points.
CoderPad10%#3 of 9
Codility9%#6 of 9
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Codility leads at enterprise.
Codility11%#4 of 8
CoderPad0%#6 of 8
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about CoderPad

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“CoderPad lacks webcam monitoring and browser lockdown features... the site can get buggy, has limited pre-built questions” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Advanced features locked behind higher tiers, occasional bugs, limited question library” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“CoderPad – Time management issues, weaker proctoring.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · soft negative
“CoderPad | End-to-End & Live Pairing | Offers a great developer experience. Candidates use a real VS Code-like environment.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“CoderPad if you want to interview candidates in real-time to gauge their communication and debugging skills.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice
“Known for live, collaborative interviews, which can provide a more realistic candidate experience” Mistral Small · negative prompt · first choice

What the models said about Codility

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.

“Avoid if budget is the main constraint... Codility tends to start higher and is more enterprise-oriented” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · hard negative
“(e.g., HackerRank, Codility, CodeSignal): ... often criticized for not reflecting real-world job tasks” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“High negative sentiment (e.g., labeled "hostile candidate experience" in AI model analyses)” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · hard negative
“### 1. Codility - Best for: Mid-market to enterprise companies needing secure, scalable assessments” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“Choose HackerRank or Codility if you are an enterprise needing rigorous automated screening” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.