AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › Codecademy · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Named, not ranked

Codecademy

5Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
3 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Codecademy was named 5 times in Skills intelligence and 1 other category, where Skills Base led with 18%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In skills intelligence · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Codecademy for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Skills intelligencePerformance and talent management0%38 of 1270%3under 10 labels · led by Skills Base at 18%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Online course librariesLearning and development0%27 of 950%2under 10 labels · led by Udemy Business at 48%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Codecademy held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Skills intelligence · by segment

Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 36 of 117, unchanged

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Skills intelligence0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 38 of 127, unchanged
Online course libraries0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 24 → 27 of 95

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Codecademy across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small01102
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00101
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX02002
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative4 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Build coding & technical skills | Codecademy, Pluralsight” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Skills intelligence · comparative prompt · alternative
“free interactive learning (freeCodeCamp/Codecademy)” Mistral Small · Online course libraries · comparative prompt · alternative
“Code-specific with hands-on practice” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Skills intelligence · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Codecademy, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Codecademy was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Udemy Business5 of 50Not among the top eight
edX4 of 52Not among the top eight
Khan Academy4 of 50Not among the top eight
Skillshare4 of 50Not among the top eight
Coursera3 of 51Not among the top eight
LinkedIn Learning3 of 50Not among the top eight
Coursera for Business2 of 51Not among the top eight
Pluralsight Skills2 of 51Not among the top eight
Degreed2 of 50Not among the top eight
Eightfold AI2 of 50Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Codecademy. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 5 answers that named Codecademy and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

coursebox.ai2
edu-skill.com2
g2.com2
moldstud.com2
21kschool.com1
aaup.org1
boot.dev1
buddyboss.com1
business.edx.org1
careeraway.com1

Fourteen of the fourteen domain citations in answers naming Codecademy came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on codecademy.com
7,244
subdomains included
Content
3,693
counted in the table below
Documentation
3,492
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Glossary or explainer2,87902026-02-10
Blog72032026-09-22
Comparison4002025-06-30
Case study1902022-08-31
Conference or event16162026-10-17
Report or ebook1502025-02-07
Webinar or virtual event2undated
Template or tool202022-05-04

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page codecademy.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Codecademy

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Codecademy; a claim can dispute any of them.
Codecademy / DataCamp 1

Follow Codecademy

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Codecademy is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Learn the technical skills to get the job you want. Join over 50 million people choosing Codecademy to start a new career (or advance in their current one).
For
people choosing Codecademy to start a new career (or advance in their current one)
Price stated
free or paid courses codecademy.com
Free plan or trial
for Free codecademy.com
Certifications
AWSMicrosoftCompTIAISC2GoogleCiscoIIBAISTQB
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, integrations, hosting, customers

What Codecademy's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: codecademy.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Codecademy's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Codecademy, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Codecademy by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Codecademy is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Codecademy, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at codecademy.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.