AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › CEIPAL · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Named, not ranked

CEIPAL

6Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. CEIPAL was named 4 times in Staffing agency tools and 1 other category, where Zoho Recruit led with 22%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In staffing agency tools · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named CEIPAL for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Staffing agency platformsTalent acquisition0%25 of 1360%3under 10 labels · led by Zoho Recruit at 22%
Contingent workforce managementWorkforce planning and analytics0%67 of 1210%1under 10 labels · led by VectorVMS at 16%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for CEIPAL yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated CEIPAL across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna01102
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative5 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“VMS-heavy or contingent workforce workflows: Put CEIPAL on the shortlist” GPT-6 Luna · Staffing agency tools · comparative prompt · alternative
“Want one platform for ATS + VMS + workforce management: CEIPAL” GPT-5.4 mini · Staffing agency tools · comparative prompt · alternative
“CEIPAL provides strong value for SMBs” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Staffing agency tools · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as CEIPAL, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CEIPAL was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Bullhorn5 of 63Not among the top eight
Aviont\u00e94 of 61Not among the top eight
JobDiva3 of 60Not among the top eight
Loxo2 of 60Not among the top eight
TempWorks2 of 60Not among the top eight
SAP Fieldglass1 of 61Not among the top eight
Workday VNDLY1 of 61Not among the top eight
Access Vincere1 of 60Not among the top eight
Beeline1 of 60Not among the top eight
Carerix1 of 60Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CEIPAL. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 6 answers that named CEIPAL and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

bullhorn.com4
avionte.com3
ceipal.comYour site3
jobdiva.com2
spott.io2
beeline.com1
capterra.co.uk1
capterra.com1
crelate.com1
firsthr.app1

Sixteen of the nineteen domain citations in answers naming CEIPAL came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

ceipal.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, CEIPAL takes 0% of first choices and Zoho Recruit takes 22%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “staffing agency platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “staffing agency platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
3,600 a month (“ceipal”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
52 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 3,809 a month
Searches its site ranks for
752 · 36 in the top three
Sites linking to it
2,140
Paid Google search
1 searches its ads show for, about 53 clicks and $527 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
11 ads · 9 text, 1 image, 1 video · 1 shown in the last 30 days

First shown March 2024, as Ceipal, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 5 in the year, 6 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 25 of 136 in staffing agency tools
Segment leader
22%
Zoho Recruit
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
6 answers
Its own site cited
in 6 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on ceipal.com
1,257
subdomains included
Content
651
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 109
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog517undatedApplicant tracking syste, Employee onboarding
Case study45undatedApplicant tracking syste
Conference or event3702026-03-05
Comparison32undatedApplicant tracking syste
Webinar or virtual event802026-03-05
Glossary or explainer5undatedApplicant tracking syste
Template or tool3undated
Report or ebook2undated
News or press2undated

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page ceipal.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name applicant tracking syste (49); 0 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow CEIPAL

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

CEIPAL is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
AI-powered talent acquisition platform that combines an Applicant Tracking System (ATS), Vendor Management System (VMS), and Workforce Management into a single unified platform.
For
staffing agencies, healthcare staffing firms, corporate recruiting teams, and Global Capability Centers (GCCs)
Free plan or trial
Get a free demo. ceipal.com/integrations
Integrations claimed
200 ceipal.com · 100 ceipal.com/integrations pages disagree
Certifications
SOC 2ISO 27001SSAE 16/18
Hosting
the United Statesother jurisdictions where Ceipal Affiliates and Sub-Processors have operations
Customers named
BTGManaged StaffingThe AgencyTechnogenCyber NirvanaMicroinfo IncRelantoKastech Software Solutions
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price

What CEIPAL's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: ceipal.com, ceipal.com/legal/security, ceipal.com/case-studies, ceipal.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CEIPAL's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CEIPAL, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for CEIPAL by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where CEIPAL is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name CEIPAL, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at ceipal.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.