AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › BRAVO · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

BRAVO

7Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. BRAVO was named 2 times in Recognition and rewards, where Bonusly led with 29%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In recognition and rewards · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named BRAVO for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Recognition and rewardsOnboarding and employee experience2%11 of 980%2under 10 labels · led by Bonusly at 29%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.

Movement

Since September 2026, BRAVO held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Recognition and rewards · by segment

Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 20 of 50, unchanged
Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 11 of 87, unchanged
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 43 → 36 of 46

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Recognition and rewards0%2%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.New this editionRank 11 of 98, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated BRAVO across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX10001
MiniMax M2.500101
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 label1
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained4 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Built specifically for mid-market companies, runs on automation (no program manager needed), transparent pricing” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Recognition and rewards · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as BRAVO, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and BRAVO was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Bonusly5 of 73Not among the top eight
Nectar5 of 71Not among the top eight
Guusto2 of 72Not among the top eight
Workhuman2 of 71Not among the top eight
Achievers2 of 70Not among the top eight
Engagedly2 of 70Not among the top eight
TeamToast1 of 71Not among the top eight
Applauz1 of 70Not among the top eight
Assembly1 of 70Not among the top eight
Awardco1 of 70Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named BRAVO. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 7 answers that named BRAVO and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

getbravo.ioYour site7
peoplemanagingpeople.com6
engagedly.com4
workhuman.com4
g2.com3
matterapp.com3
thrivesparrow.com3
xoxoday.com3
achievers.com2
blackthorn-vision.com2

Thirty of the thirty-seven domain citations in answers naming BRAVO came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on getbravo.io
349
subdomains included
Content
223
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
11 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog196172026-10-01Recognition and rewards, Performance management
Comparison1302026-06-23
Case study802024-09-05
Glossary or explainer502026-06-09
Template or tool102024-04-04
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page getbravo.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as BRAVO

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as BRAVO; a claim can dispute any of them.
BRAVO (by WorkHub) 1Bravo 1

Follow BRAVO

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

BRAVO is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Employee Recognition Software That Drives Results
For
HR teams across 15+ industries
Price stated
starts at $3/user/month getbravo.io
Starting price
3 getbravo.io
Free plan or trial
Free demo getbravo.io
Integrations claimed
60 getbravo.io
Customers named
ChemicoEnerforgeProducePayXS BrokersA Place For MomHoidaleMeternetOshawa Power
Not stated on the pages read
Certifications, hosting

What BRAVO's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: getbravo.io, getbravo.io/pricing, getbravo.io/features. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when BRAVO's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as BRAVO, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for BRAVO by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where BRAVO is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name BRAVO, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at getbravo.io is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.