AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › Blackboard · October 2026 Edition
3 categories · Named, not ranked

Blackboard

6Judge labels
0First choices
3Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Blackboard was named 5 times in Candidate assessment and 2 other categories, where TestGorilla led with 52%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In candidate assessment · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Blackboard for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Candidate assessmentTalent acquisition0%30 of 1180%2under 10 labels · led by TestGorilla at 52%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Learning experience platformsLearning and development0%65 of 8950%2under 10 labels · led by 360Learning at 26%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Online course librariesLearning and development0%77 of 95100%1under 10 labels · led by Udemy Business at 48%

Movement

Since September 2026, Blackboard held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Candidate assessment · by segment

Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 60 → 30 of 115

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Candidate assessment0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 60 → 30 of 118
Learning experience plat0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 65 of 89, unchanged
Online course libraries0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 77 of 95, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Blackboard across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500101
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00011
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00011

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Established institutional platform with broad features” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Candidate assessment · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid traditional Legacy Learning Management Systems (like older versions of Blackboard or rigid SAP SuccessFactors implementations)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Learning experience plat · negative prompt · hard negative
“Blackboard / Anthology is “incumbent in higher-ed, legacy code-base concern, ongoing platform-consolidation.”” Muse Glimmer 30B · Online course libraries · comparative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Blackboard, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Blackboard was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Canvas LMS4 of 60Not among the top eight
Moodle3 of 60Not among the top eight
SAP SuccessFactors Learning3 of 60Not among the top eight
Coursera for Business2 of 61Not among the top eight
TestGorilla2 of 61Not among the top eight
Cornerstone OnDemand2 of 60Not among the top eight
Quizlet2 of 60Not among the top eight
Udemy Business2 of 60Not among the top eight
edX2 of 60Not among the top eight
Cornerstone Content Subscriptions1 of 61Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Blackboard. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 6 answers that named Blackboard and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

aihr.com2
capterra.com2
g2.com2
getapp.com2
gitnux.org2
ispring.com2
mentimeter.com2
softwareadvice.com2
testgorilla.com2
worldmetrics.org2

Twenty of the twenty domain citations in answers naming Blackboard came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

blackboard.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Blackboard takes 0% of first choices and TestGorilla takes 52%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “assessment platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “pre-employment assessment platform”
–
not in the top ten
Organic visits to its site
about 1,253,959 a month
Searches its site ranks for
9,294 · 3,132 in the top three
Sites linking to it
20,769
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
11 ads · 11 text · 2 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2024, as Blackboard, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 4 in the year, 7 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 30 of 118 in candidate assessment
Segment leader
52%
TestGorilla
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
6 answers
Its own site cited
in 4 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on blackboard.com
1,151
subdomains included
Content
514
counted in the table below
Documentation
174
Product · Integration
20 · 1
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
News or press27652026-09-14Learning management syst
Blog11542026-09-23
Webinar or virtual event7672026-09-23
Conference or event2002025-03-05
Comparison1002024-01-27
Report or ebook512026-07-07
Case study402024-04-24
Podcast or video412026-07-23
Template or tool3undated
Glossary or explainer1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page blackboard.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Blackboard

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Blackboard is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
AI-Powered LMS for Transformational Teaching & Learning
For
higher education, businesses, and government
Certifications
ISO 27001ISO 27701ISO 27017ISO 27018SOC 2 Type 2SOC 2FERPAGDPR
Customers named
Sacred Heart UniversityBridgewater State UniversityGrand Valley State UniversityMetroHealthWyoming Law Enforcement AcademyUniversity of South CarolinaInteramerican University of Puerto RicoKCTCS
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting

What Blackboard's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: blackboard.com, blackboard.com/trust-center/security, blackboard.com/solutions/lms, blackboard.com/resources/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Blackboard's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Blackboard, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Blackboard by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Blackboard is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Blackboard, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at blackboard.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.