| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internal communications and intranet | Onboarding and employee experience | 5% | 8 of 86 | 0% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Teams at 14% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Succession planning | Performance and talent management | 2% | 16 of 93 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 28% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. |
| Talent intelligence | Performance and talent management | 0% | 74 of 90 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Pin at 27% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internal communications | 2% | 6% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 13 → 8 of 86 |
| Succession planning | 0% | 2% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. | New this edition | Rank 16 of 93, unchanged |
| Talent intelligence | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 74 of 90, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Bitrix24 is one of the few platforms offering a free forever plan with unlimited users” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Internal communications · budget prompt · first choice
“I'd start with Bitrix24 or Zoho Connect - both offer robust free tiers” MiniMax M2.5 · Internal communications · budget prompt · first choice
“Zoho People or Bitrix24 (both free) if you need basic functionality” MiniMax M2.5 · Succession planning · budget prompt · first choice
“🏆 Top Recommendation: Bitrix24 (Free Tier)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Internal communications · budget prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“though the "intelligence" features (like deep AI sourcing) are limited compared to paid tools” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Talent intelligence · budget prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 23 of the 24 answers that named Bitrix24 and are not a share of its labels.
Eighty-seven of the eighty-seven domain citations in answers naming Bitrix24 came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1,814 | 12 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Comparison | 451 | 2 | 2026-08-27 | ||
| Template or tool | 397 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 43 | 0 | 2026-06-25 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 38 | 0 | 2025-12-24 | ||
| Report or ebook | 11 | 0 | 2025-02-13 | ||
| Case study | 5 | 0 | 2025-03-11 | ||
| Conference or event | 3 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 2 | 0 | 2025-12-11 | ||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
Every page bitrix24.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Bitrix24's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: bitrix24.com, bitrix24.com/solutions, bitrix24.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Bitrix24's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Bitrix24, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Bitrix24 by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: