AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › Avature VMS · October 2026 Edition
Avature · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Avature VMS

2Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
2 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Avature VMS was named 1 time in Contingent workforce man, where VectorVMS led with 16%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In contingent workforce man · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Avature VMS for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Contingent workforce managementWorkforce planning and analytics0%64 of 1210%1under 10 labels · led by VectorVMS at 16%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Avature VMS held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Contingent workforce man · by segment

Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 76 of 95, unchanged
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 28 → 61 of 111
EnterprisegoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsNot ranked

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Contingent workforce man0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 28 → 64 of 121

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Avature VMS across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative2 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Avature VMS, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Avature VMS was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Beeline2 of 20Not among the top eight
Coupa Contingent Workforce2 of 20Not among the top eight
SAP Fieldglass2 of 20Not among the top eight
CXC Global1 of 20Not among the top eight
Deel HR1 of 20Not among the top eight
Instawork1 of 20Not among the top eight
Magnit1 of 20Not among the top eight
Pontoon Solutions1 of 20Not among the top eight
Rippling1 of 20Not among the top eight
TAPFIN1 of 20Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Avature VMS. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 2 answers that named Avature VMS and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gitnux.org2
peoplemanagingpeople.com2
worldmetrics.org2
zipdo.co2
adp.com1
conexisvmssoftware.com1
hrtechsaas.com1
sap.com1
venn.com1
workday.com1

Fourteen of the fourteen domain citations in answers naming Avature VMS came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

avature.net ranks first on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Avature VMS takes 0% of first choices and VectorVMS takes 16%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “contingent workforce platforms”
1
Position for “vendor management system for contingent workers”
–
not in the top ten
Its company's site
avature.net shared with Avature's other products; the figures are the site's
Organic visits to its site
about 541,149 a month
Searches its site ranks for
8,192 · 1,037 in the top three
Sites linking to it
11,711
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
44+ ads · 31 text, 9 video, 4 image · 44 shown in the last 30 days

First shown August 2026, as Maximus, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 44 in the year. 76 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 64 of 121 in contingent workforce man
Segment leader
16%
VectorVMS
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
2 answers
Its own site cited
in 2 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as Avature VMS

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Avature VMS; a claim can dispute any of them.
Avature 1

Follow Avature VMS

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Avature is the company behind Avature VMS.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
The AI-powered solution that redefines the power of a flexible workforce.
Certifications
ISO 27001 since 2017ISO 27017 since 2021SOC 1 since 2013SOC 2 Type II since 2016FedRAMP Authorized status since April 2025GDPR-compliant
Customers named
Siemens EnergyKellyOCGDeloitte AustraliaAccenture
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, hosting

What Avature VMS's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: avature.net/contingent-workforce-management, avature.net/de/contingent-workforce-management, avature.net/blogs/addressing-the-contingent-black-hole, avature.net/blogs/the-best-approach-to-hiring-contingent-workers-explained, avature.net/case-study/a-world-of-opportunity-how-deloitte-engages-the-contingent-workforce. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Avature VMS's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Avature VMS, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Avature VMS by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Avature VMS is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Avature VMS, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at avature.net is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.