Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 127 → 90 of 100
2 categories · RankedXactly
29Judge labels
0First choices
7Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Compensation management for enterprise buyers
Rank 108 of 140 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 40% of its 5 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business97 of 108
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market108 of 140
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise22 of 126
0%19 labels
accepted challenger
In compensation management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Xactly for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compensation management | Compensation and total rewards | 0% | 108 of 140 | 40% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Pave at 18% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Performance management | Performance and talent management | 0% | 74 of 85 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 43% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Xactly held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Compensation management · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 118 → 117 of 131
Enterprise▼−1Since September 2026: 1% → 0%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 1% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 12 pointsRank 16 → 24 of 109
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compensation management | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 118 → 108 of 140 |
| Performance management | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 74 of 85, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Xactly across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Xactly across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct9 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative9 labelsNone
Budget-constrained5 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative5 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative29 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Need sales commissions? Evaluate Xactly separately from general compensation tools.” GPT-6 Luna · Compensation management · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“the team lacks the massive administrative resources required to run enterprise software like Xactly or Varicent” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Compensation management · direct prompt · soft negative
“very strong, but often better suited to larger enterprises with dedicated comp ops resources” GPT-5.4 mini · Compensation management · direct prompt · soft negative
“Unlike legacy enterprise tools (like Varicent or Xactly) which can be rigid and slow” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Performance management · direct prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Xactly, over the 29 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Xactly was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Xactly, over the 29 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Xactly was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Xactly. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 25 of the 29 answers that named Xactly and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
captivateiq.com19
ravio.com16
comprehensive.io8
darwinbox.com8
learn.g2.com8
compup.io7
everstage.com7
gartner.com7
quotapath.com7
compport.com6
Ninety-three of the ninety-three domain citations in answers naming Xactly came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
xactlycorp.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Xactly takes 0% of first choices and Pave takes 18%.ShowHide
Search and answers
xactlycorp.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Xactly takes 0% of first choices and Pave takes 18%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “compensation platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “compensation management software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 5,400 a month (“xactly”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 135 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 25,619 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 2,457 · 319 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 3,097
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 108 of 140 in compensation management
Segment leader
18%
Pave
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 29 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 25 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on xactlycorp.com
738
subdomains included
Content
610
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
38 · 17
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 380 | 0 | 2025-01-01 | ||
| Report or ebook | 82 | undated | |||
| Case study | 51 | undated | |||
| News or press | 32 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 27 | 0 | 2025-12-10 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 19 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 15 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 3 | 1 | 2026-10-12 | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-10-12Workday rising conference or event
- 2025-12-10AI wont fix a broken revenue engine webinar or virtual event
- 2025-09-24Customer conversations how cox automotive drives accuracy and agility xactly webinar or virtual event
- 2025-01-01Why xactly why now blog
- 2024-07-23Arnab mishra ceo xactly interview series blog
- 2024-07-23How cfos can win be switzerland blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page xactlycorp.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Xactly
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Xactly is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Xactly is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI-driven Sales Commission & Performance Management Platform
- For
- sales performance management
- Price stated
- free xactlycorp.com
- Starting price
- 0 xactlycorp.com
- Integrations claimed
- 6 xactlycorp.com
- Hosting
- EUCA central
- Customers named
- SpirentZywave, IncInformation Technology and Services companyCox AutomotiveAccentureFlowserveWorkdayAbbott Laboratories
- Not stated on the pages read
- Free plan or trial, certifications
What Xactly's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: xactlycorp.com, trust.xactlycorp.com, xactlycorp.com/platform-overview, xactlycorp.com/customer-stories, xactlycorp.com/company/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Xactly's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Xactly, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Xactly by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Xactly is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Xactly, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.