Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 125 → 91 of 100
1 category · RankedHRSoft Compensation Management
30Judge labels
3First choices
8Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
5% in Compensation management for enterprise buyers
Rank 45 of 140 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 25% of its 8 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business99 of 108
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market45 of 140
0%8 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise4 of 126
5%18 labels
accepted challenger
In compensation management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named HRSoft Compensation Management for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compensation management | Compensation and total rewards | 0% | 45 of 140 | 25% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by Pave at 18% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, HRSoft Compensation Management held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Compensation management · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 50 → 83 of 131
Enterprise▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 7%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
7%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 8 → 3 of 109
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compensation management | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 50 → 45 of 140 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated HRSoft Compensation Management across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated HRSoft Compensation Management across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labels1
Paraphrase5 labels2
Comparative7 labelsNone
Budget-constrained5 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative7 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative30 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“best if you want a more purpose-built compensation planning platform for merit, bonus, and incentive cycles” GPT-5.4 mini · Compensation management · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“expensive enterprise software (such as Radford, Mercer, or HRSoft) that comes with high subscription rates and steep implementation fees” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Compensation management · budget prompt · soft negative
“enterprise platforms like HRSoft and beqom typically require more configuration time” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Compensation management · comparative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as HRSoft Compensation Management, over the 30 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and HRSoft Compensation Management was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as HRSoft Compensation Management, over the 30 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and HRSoft Compensation Management was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named HRSoft Compensation Management. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 30 of the 30 answers that named HRSoft Compensation Management and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
ravio.com23
captivateiq.com20
g2.com16
learn.g2.com15
comprehensive.io14
darwinbox.com13
compport.com11
gartner.com10
hibob.com10
figures.hr8
140 of the 140 domain citations in answers naming HRSoft Compensation Management came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
hrsoft.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, HRSoft Compensation Management takes 0% of first choices and Pave takes 18%.ShowHide
Search and answers
hrsoft.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, HRSoft Compensation Management takes 0% of first choices and Pave takes 18%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “compensation platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “compensation management software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 40 a month (“hrsoft compensation management”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 1,230 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 848 · 21 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,265
- Paid Google search
- 1 searches its ads show for, about 0 clicks and $0 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 45 of 140 in compensation management
Segment leader
18%
Pave
- First choices
- 3 across its categories
- Named in
- 30 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 30 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on hrsoft.com
387
subdomains included
Content
245
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 11
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 221 | 15 | 2026-09-17 | Compensation management, Performance management | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 7 | 1 | 2026-08-13 | ||
| Conference or event | 6 | 0 | 2022-06-09 | ||
| Comparison | 4 | 2 | 2026-08-25 | Compensation management | |
| Glossary or explainer | 4 | 0 | 2026-06-04 | Compensation management | |
| Report or ebook | 2 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-17What separates an ai program from an ai policy blog
- 2026-09-01A guide to executive compensation packages blog
- 2026-08-25Total comp vs total rewards comparison
- 2026-08-21From day one hr forum 2026 blog
- 2026-08-21From day one total rewards forum 2026 blog
- 2026-08-21Consero chro forum 2026 blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page hrsoft.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as HRSoft Compensation Management
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as HRSoft Compensation Management; a claim can dispute any of them.
HRSoft 7HRSoft Compensation Management / CompXL 1
Follow HRSoft Compensation Management
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
HRSoft Compensation Management is its own company.ShowHide
The company
HRSoft Compensation Management is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI-Powered Compensation Management Software; leading AI-powered compensation management software; unified, purpose-built SaaS platform designed to streamline the entire compensation lifecycle
- For
- organizations
- Price stated
- Get a custom quote for your organization's size, complexity and global footprint. hrsoft.com/pricing
- Integrations claimed
- 1 hrsoft.com/pricing
- Certifications
- SOC 2SOC 1
- Customers named
- Walmart CanadaPMA
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, free plan or trial, hosting
What HRSoft Compensation Management's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: hrsoft.com, hrsoft.com/pricing, trust.hrsoft.com, hrsoft.com/case-studies, hrsoft.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when HRSoft Compensation Management's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as HRSoft Compensation Management, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for HRSoft Compensation Management by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where HRSoft Compensation Management is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name HRSoft Compensation Management, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.