Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 78 → 82 of 91
2 categories · Named, not rankedTyler Technologies
4Judge labels
0First choices
4Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Tyler Technologies was named 2 times in HR compliance and 1 other category, where Rippling led with 19%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market90 of 97
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprise83 of 84
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
In hr compliance · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Tyler Technologies for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR compliance and policy management | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 90 of 97 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 19% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| HR help desk and case management | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 104 of 108 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Zoho Desk at 19% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Tyler Technologies held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · HR compliance · by segment
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 69 → 70 of 72
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR compliance | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 78 → 90 of 97 |
| HR help desk | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 89 → 104 of 108 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Tyler Technologies across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Tyler Technologies across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Tyler Technologies – Suffered a significant data breach in March 2024 exposing employee PII including SSNs and driver's licenses” Kimi K2 · HR help desk · negative prompt · hard negative
“2024 breach exposed PII ... resulting in class-action settlements” Grok 4.1 Fast · HR compliance · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Tyler Technologies, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Tyler Technologies was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Tyler Technologies, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Tyler Technologies was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Tyler Technologies. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named Tyler Technologies and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
blog.inovium.com4
cxcglobal.com3
deel.com2
faceup.com2
g2.com2
guideflow.com2
hrcloud.com2
linkedin.com2
navex.com2
paycor.com2
Twenty-three of the twenty-three domain citations in answers naming Tyler Technologies came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on tylertech.com
2,224
subdomains included
Content
2,213
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1,222 | 41 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 349 | 27 | 2026-09-28 | Performance management | |
| Case study | 314 | 1 | 2026-09-08 | Employee onboarding | |
| Conference or event | 153 | 76 | 2026-09-16 | ||
| Podcast or video | 134 | 1 | 2026-09-23 | ||
| Report or ebook | 22 | 1 | 2026-09-21 | ||
| Comparison | 10 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 5 | undated | |||
| News or press | 4 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Licensing software for multi role government teams blog
- 2026-09-28From paperwork to online payment modernized utility billing webinar or virtual event
- 2026-09-28Tyler technologies ai solutions for state government blog
- 2026-09-23Enterprise utilities links billing service and field work blog
- 2026-09-23Enterprise financial management insight and flexibility blog
- 2026-09-23City simplifies utility services for out of state students webinar or virtual event
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page tylertech.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Tyler Technologies
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Tyler Technologies is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Tyler Technologies is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Software & Services for the Public Sector
- For
- state, local, and federal government organizations and school districts
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What Tyler Technologies's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: tylertech.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Tyler Technologies's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Tyler Technologies, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Tyler Technologies by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Tyler Technologies is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Tyler Technologies, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.