Together vs PushFar
Six of fourteen models named Together first on the direct prompt; zero named PushFar. Together was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and PushFar by twelve and Together carries 46 labels and PushFar 22, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in three categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the mentoring software page.
By framing
TogetherFirst choices, of fourteen modelsPushFar
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Together and PushFar were named in the same answer forty-nine times, of the 168 answers naming Together and the 70 naming PushFar. In those answers PushFar took the first choice eleven times and Together five.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | | | |
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | |
Together PushFar first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Together on the left and PushFar on the right.The direct prompt
Together first, PushFar an alternative
6 of 14 modelsPushFar was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
4 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
PushFar19%#2 of 12Together6%#5 of 12Together28%#1 of 12PushFar9%#4 of 12What the models said about Together
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of five in this category shown.
“What to Avoid on a Tight Budget ... Together Platform: Starts at ~$10,000–$12,000/year” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Major enterprise players like Together, Chronus, and MentorcliQ typically start at $10,000+ per year” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“I want to run an internal program for my company. | Together or MentorcliQ | Strong integrations, automated matching, and robust executive reporting.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Together Platform: Widely considered one of the best for user experience (UX) and ease of use... making it incredibly easy to launch with minimal admin hours.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“Together and Guider are frequently highlighted as top choices because they are easy to set up” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about PushFar
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“Best Free Option: PushFar ... widely recognized as the best free option for internal mentoring programs” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
“For a limited budget, the strongest recommendation from the results is PushFar.” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
“would be MentorGain, Together Platform, or PushFar” Llama 4 Maverick · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.