AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Learning and development › Mentoring software › Together vs Mentorloop
Mentoring software · October 2026 Edition

Together vs Mentorloop

Six of fourteen models named Together first on the direct prompt; four named Mentorloop. Together was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Mentorloop by eleven and Together carries 46 labels and Mentorloop 27, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Together

accepted challenger

Named in three categories this edition.

Mentorloop

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share28%15%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate4%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#2A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels4627A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Together reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Qooper was named alongside these two in nine of the fourteen direct answers. Together vs MentorcliQ · Together vs PushFar · Together vs Chronus

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the mentoring software page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
TogetherFirst choices, of fourteen modelsMentorloop
Direct64
Paraphrase82
Comparative10
Budget-constrained022 against Together
Scale-constrained10
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Together and Mentorloop were named in the same answer sixty-eight times, of the 168 answers naming Together and the 95 naming Mentorloop. In those answers Mentorloop took the first choice twenty-one times and Together eleven.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Together and Mentorloop stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Together Mentorloop first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Together on the left and Mentorloop on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Together and Mentorloop stood in it.

Both were the first choice

2 of 14 modelsThe answer named them together, and the judge labeled each a first choice.
Claude Haiku 4.5Mentorloop, Together alternatives: Guider, Qooper
MiniMax M2.5Mentorloop, Together alternatives: Chronus, MentorcliQ, Mentorgain, PushFar

Together first, Mentorloop an alternative

4 of 14 modelsMentorloop was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Gemini 3.5 FlashTogether alternatives: Guider, Mentorloop, Qooper
Mistral SmallTogether alternatives: Mentorgain, Qooper
Kimi K2Together alternatives: MentorcliQ, Qooper
GPT-6 LunaTogether alternatives: Chronus, MentorcliQ, Qooper

Mentorloop first, Together not the choice

2 of 14 modelsTogether was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GLM 4.7 FlashXMentorcliQ, Mentorloop alternatives: Chronus, Qooper
Muse Glimmer 30BMentorloop alternatives: Guider, MentorCity

Neither was the first choice, one was named

4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniChronus alternatives: MentorcliQ, Together
Perplexity SonarMentorcliQ alternatives: Chronus, Together
Grok 4.1 FastMentorcliQ alternatives: Chronus, Qooper, Together
DeepSeek V4 FlashMentorcliQ alternatives: Chronus, Qooper, Together

Neither was named

2 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Llama 4 MaverickGuider, MentorCity, Qooper, Together Corporate Mentorship
Qwen 3.7 FlashChronus, MentorFlow alternatives: CoachHub, Lighthouse, Talmundo

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Mentorloop leads by thirty-one points.
Mentorloop37%#1 of 12
Together6%#5 of 12
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Together leads at mid-market.
Together28%#1 of 12
Mentorloop15%#2 of 12
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Together leads by sixteen points.
Together18%#3 of 8
Mentorloop2%#5 of 8
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Together

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of five in this category shown.

“What to Avoid on a Tight Budget ... Together Platform: Starts at ~$10,000–$12,000/year” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Major enterprise players like Together, Chronus, and MentorcliQ typically start at $10,000+ per year” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“I want to run an internal program for my company. | Together or MentorcliQ | Strong integrations, automated matching, and robust executive reporting.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Together Platform: Widely considered one of the best for user experience (UX) and ease of use... making it incredibly easy to launch with minimal admin hours.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“Together and Guider are frequently highlighted as top choices because they are easy to set up” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice

What the models said about Mentorloop

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“Start with Mentorloop Pro ($299/mo). It's the only major platform that combines commercial-grade features with small-team pricing.” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend evaluating Mentorloop or Together first, as they're most frequently cited as purpose-built for your company size.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“If you want low admin overhead and organic adoption, Mentorloop is the most referenced mid-market pick.” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.