AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › Textio · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Named, not ranked

Textio

8Judge labels
0First choices
2Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Textio was named 2 times in AI recruiting assistants and 1 other category, where Manatal led with 31%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In ai recruiting assistants · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Textio for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
AI recruiting assistantsTalent acquisition0%52 of 900%1under 10 labels · led by Manatal at 31%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Recruitment marketing and career sitesTalent acquisition0%91 of 104100%1under 10 labels · led by Teamtailor at 23%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

Since September 2026, Textio held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · AI recruiting assistants · by segment

Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 51 of 80, unchanged
Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 51 of 84, unchanged
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 25 of 74, unchanged

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
AI recruiting assistants0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 52 of 90, unchanged
Recruitment marketing0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 91 of 104, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Textio across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200011
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative5 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Textio is best for improving job post language and reducing bias signals” Claude Haiku 4.5 · AI recruiting assistants · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Workflow friction, duplicate boilerplate content... limited pricing transparency” Kimi K2 · Recruitment marketing · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Textio, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Textio was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Eightfold AI4 of 82Not among the top eight
HireVue4 of 80Not among the top eight
Indeed3 of 80Not among the top eight
Workday Recruiting3 of 80Not among the top eight
Greenhouse2 of 80Not among the top eight
LinkedIn Talent Solutions2 of 80Not among the top eight
Paradox2 of 80Not among the top eight
ZipRecruiter2 of 80Not among the top eight
iCIMS2 of 80Not among the top eight
DE Amplify1 of 81Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Textio. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 8 answers that named Textio and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cloudtalk.io3
g2.com3
hiretruffle.com3
selectsoftwarereviews.com3
forbes.com2
greenhouse.com2
leonar.app2
lever.co2
metaview.ai2
pin.com2

Twenty-four of the twenty-four domain citations in answers naming Textio came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on textio.com
516
subdomains included
Content
481
counted in the table below
Documentation
2
Product · Integration
7 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog45002025-12-16Applicant tracking syste, Performance management
Webinar or virtual event1002018-06-26
Case study702023-01-31
Comparison6undated
Conference or event4undated
Glossary or explainer3undated
News or press1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page textio.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Textio

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Textio is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
AI for Recruiting and Performance Management
For
recruiting and performance teams
Price stated
Create a free trial account to get started or contact us to design a package for your business. textio.com
Free plan or trial
free trial textio.com
Certifications
ISO/IEC 27001:2022SOC 2 Type IICloud Security Alliance (CSA)Textio Verified
Hosting
United States
Customers named
T-MobileNASDAQStravaUpworkTeachstoneMicronZendeskVelera
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, integrations

What Textio's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: textio.com, textio.com/security, textio.com/products/feedback, textio.com/resources/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Textio's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Textio, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Textio by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Textio is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Textio, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at textio.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.