Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 14 → 83 of 88
1 category · Named, not rankedSuccessionHR
10Judge labels
5First choices
2Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. SuccessionHR was named 4 times in Succession planning, where Lattice led with 28%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business84 of 91
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market10 of 93
4%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise4 of 82
5%3 labels
under the label threshold
In succession planning · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named SuccessionHR for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Succession planning | Performance and talent management | 4% | 10 of 93 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 28% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, SuccessionHR held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Succession planning · by segment
Mid-market▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 45 → 9 of 87
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 5 of 71, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Succession planning | 0% | 4% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 45 → 10 of 93 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated SuccessionHR across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated SuccessionHR across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labels2
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained5 labels3
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“SuccessionHR offers the best balance of purpose-built functionality, reasonable pricing, and strong user satisfaction” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Succession planning · direct prompt · first choice
“SuccessionHR - a standalone succession system for mid-sized organizations” Llama 4 Maverick · Succession planning · direct prompt · first choice
“SuccessionHR is the option when you want succession decoupled from your core HRIS” Muse Glimmer 30B · Succession planning · direct prompt · alternative
“Need a true succession-planning tool → SuccessionHR” GPT-5.4 mini · Succession planning · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SuccessionHR, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SuccessionHR was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SuccessionHR, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SuccessionHR was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SuccessionHR. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 10 answers that named SuccessionHR and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
firsthr.app6
skillpanel.com6
softwareadvice.com5
capterra.com4
engagedly.com4
guideflow.com4
talentguard.com4
successionhr.comYour site3
workhuman.com3
capterra.co.uk2
Thirty-eight of the forty-one domain citations in answers naming SuccessionHR came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
successionhr.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, SuccessionHR takes 4% of first choices and Lattice takes 28%.ShowHide
Search and answers
successionhr.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, SuccessionHR takes 4% of first choices and Lattice takes 28%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “succession planning tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “succession planning software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 30 a month (“successionhr”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 147 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 58 · 2 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 152
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
4%
rank 10 of 93 in succession planning
Segment leader
28%
Lattice
- First choices
- 5 across its categories
- Named in
- 10 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 10 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on successionhr.com
216
subdomains included
Content
88
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 79 | undated | Succession planning | ||
| Comparison | 7 | undated | Succession planning, Workforce planning | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 1 | 1 | 2026-09-16 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | undated | Succession planning |
Most recent
- 2026-09-16Upcoming webinars webinar or virtual event
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page successionhr.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow SuccessionHR
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
SuccessionHR is its own company.ShowHide
The company
SuccessionHR is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI-powered succession planning software that helps organizations identify and manage key roles, detect succession risk, and build successor candidate pipelines.
- For
- Mid-to-large organizations where leaders need clear, executive-ready visibility into succession risk, readiness, and leadership pipelines.
- Price stated
- Pricing is based on the number of Key Role Succession Plans you identify for your company, not on employee headcount or users. successionhr.com/pricing
- Starting price
- 6345 successionhr.com/pricing
- Integrations claimed
- 70 successionhr.com
- Not stated on the pages read
- Free plan or trial, certifications, hosting, customers
What SuccessionHR's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: successionhr.com, successionhr.com/pricing, successionhr.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SuccessionHR's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SuccessionHR, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SuccessionHR by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where SuccessionHR is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name SuccessionHR, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.