Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 70 → 74 of 125
Skima · 3 categories · RankedSkima AI
32Judge labels
2First choices
2Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Internal talent marketpl for mid-market buyers
Rank 9 of 102 in the mid-market standing
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 3 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business78 of 129
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market9 of 102
2%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In internal talent marketpl · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Skima AI for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internal talent marketplace | Performance and talent management | 2% | 9 of 102 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Fuel50 at 47% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| AI recruiting assistants | Talent acquisition | 2% | 11 of 90 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Manatal at 31% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Talent intelligence | Performance and talent management | 0% | 22 of 90 | 0% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Pin at 27% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Skima AI held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Internal talent marketpl · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 63 → 8 of 93
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internal talent marketpl | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 63 → 9 of 102 |
| AI recruiting assistants | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 37 → 11 of 90 |
| Talent intelligence | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 33 → 22 of 90 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Skima AI across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Skima AI across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct9 labels1
Paraphrase11 labels1
Comparative6 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative32 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“some of the top talent marketplace platforms include Skima AI, which is suitable for mid-market companies” Llama 4 Maverick · Internal talent marketpl · direct prompt · first choice
“Skima AI and Eightfold are excellent choices due to their advanced AI matching and scalability” Mistral Small · AI recruiting assistants · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Excellent for talent rediscovery, screening, and matching across hiring/mobility.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Talent intelligence · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Great mid-market focus with explainable matching scores and 130+ integrations” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Talent intelligence · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Skima AI, over the 32 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Skima AI was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Skima AI, over the 32 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Skima AI was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Skima AI. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 32 of the 32 answers that named Skima AI and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
skima.aiYour site27
pin.com21
g2.com10
guideflow.com10
hiretruffle.com10
lever.co10
metaview.ai9
peoplemanagingpeople.com9
engagedly.com7
herohunt.ai7
Ninety-three of the 120 domain citations in answers naming Skima AI came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
skima.ai is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Skima AI takes 2% of first choices and Fuel50 takes 47%.ShowHide
Search and answers
skima.ai is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Skima AI takes 2% of first choices and Fuel50 takes 47%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “talent marketplaces”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “internal talent marketplace”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 140 a month (“skima ai”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 47,834 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 12,757 · 342 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,079
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 9 of 102 in internal talent marketpl
Segment leader
47%
Fuel50
- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 32 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 32 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on skima.ai
1,741
subdomains included
Content
1,471
counted in the table below
Documentation
36
Product · Integration
23 · 97
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 892 | 53 | 2026-09-16 | Applicant tracking syste, Payroll software | |
| Glossary or explainer | 525 | undated | Applicant tracking syste, Talent intelligence | ||
| Comparison | 49 | 24 | 2026-07-31 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 2 | 1 | 2026-09-03 | ||
| Conference or event | 1 | 1 | 2026-08-11 | ||
| Report or ebook | 1 | 0 | 2024-06-11 | ||
| Podcast or video | 1 | 0 | 2026-01-06 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-16Bamboohr review blog
- 2026-09-09Best recruitment software blog
- 2026-09-09Recruiterflow reviews blog
- 2026-09-09Greenhouse reviews blog
- 2026-09-04Bullhorn partners blog
- 2026-09-04Teamtailor partners blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page skima.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name applicant tracking syste (13); 5 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Skima AI
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Skima is the company behind Skima AI.ShowHide
The company
Skima is the company behind Skima AI.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI recruitment platform that works inside your existing ATS or HCM
- For
- staffing agencies and high volume hiring with compliance
- Price stated
- Skima AI costs based on hiring volume, with no hidden fees, tiered add-ons, or per-hire charges. Exact costs depend on the features and capabilities your team needs. Pricing is confirmed and customized during your demo, based on your specific ATS and hiring volume. skima.ai
- Starting price
- 0 skima.ai
- Free plan or trial
- No, Skima AI doesn't offer a self-serve free trial that you can sign up for independently. Every engagement starts with a live demo using your own job data instead of generic examples. A pilot with one team follows, letting you test real results before committing to a full rollout. skima.ai
- Integrations claimed
- 130 skima.ai
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type II CertifiedNYC Local Law 144EU AI ActWarden AssuredEEOC Uniform GuidelinesFour-Fifths RuleSOC 2GDPR
- Hosting
- Worldwide
- Customers named
- LnTNykaaQantSkillforceAPSAL&TDSP Mutual Fund
What Skima AI's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: skima.ai, skima.ai/pricing, skima.ai/products/ai-search, skima.ai/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Skima AI's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Skima AI, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Skima AI by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Skima AI is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Skima AI, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.