Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 18 → 7 of 50
3 categories · Named, not rankedSkilljar
16Judge labels
1First choices
2Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Skilljar was named 4 times in Learning management syst and 2 other categories, where TalentLMS led with 51%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business8 of 52
2%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market23 of 61
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise25 of 72
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
In learning management syst · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Skilljar for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Learning management systems | Learning and development | 0% | 23 of 61 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by TalentLMS at 51% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Course authoring tools | Learning and development | 0% | 42 of 82 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Articulate 360 at 30% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Skills intelligence | Performance and talent management | 0% | 81 of 127 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Skills Base at 18% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Skilljar held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Learning management syst · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 66 → 20 of 55
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 18 → 23 of 65
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Learning management syst | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 66 → 23 of 61 |
| Course authoring tools | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 42 of 82, unchanged |
| Skills intelligence | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 101 → 81 of 127 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Skilljar across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Skilljar across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase8 labels1
Comparative5 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative16 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If your priority is Customer Success & Revenue: Go with Skilljar (best integrations)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Course authoring tools · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Skilljar is the gold standard for external B2B training.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Learning management syst · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Skilljar, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Skilljar was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Skilljar, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Skilljar was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Skilljar. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 16 answers that named Skilljar and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
d2l.com10
talentlms.com10
360learning.com7
intellum.com7
ispring.com7
absorbai.com6
docebo.com5
forbes.com5
guideflow.com5
learnworlds.com5
Sixty-seven of the sixty-seven domain citations in answers naming Skilljar came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
skilljar.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Skilljar takes 0% of first choices and TalentLMS takes 51%.ShowHide
Search and answers
skilljar.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Skilljar takes 0% of first choices and TalentLMS takes 51%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “lms for employee training”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “learning management systems”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 3,600 a month (“skilljar”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 67 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 233,929 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 2,715 · 506 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 5,680
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 23 of 61 in learning management syst
Segment leader
51%
TalentLMS
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 16 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 16 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on skilljar.com
1,289
subdomains included
Content
1,173
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 874 | 0 | 2019-10-15 | Learning management syst | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 127 | 0 | 2019-09-30 | ||
| Report or ebook | 62 | 0 | 2019-10-02 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 54 | undated | |||
| Case study | 29 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 14 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 8 | undated | Learning experience plat | ||
| Template or tool | 3 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 1 | undated | |||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2019-10-15Scorm or built in course authoring blog
- 2019-10-10Crawl walk run with microlearning lessons blog
- 2019-10-07Reducing friction in your customer training program blog
- 2019-10-035 signs your current lms is letting down customers blog
- 2019-10-02Ebook marketing customer education program report or ebook
- 2019-10-01Q3 skilljar trivia night blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page skilljar.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Skilljar
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Skilljar; a claim can dispute any of them.
Skilljar (by Gainsight) 1
Follow Skilljar
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Skilljar is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Skilljar is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- LMS Software for Customer Education & Training
- For
- your customers, partners, and team members
- Certifications
- aicpa soccloud securiy allianceSOC 2 Type IICSA Trusted Cloud ProviderSalesforce.com Security Review
- Hosting
- United States
- Customers named
- EgnyteAsanaSmartsheetAirtableAlarm.comApprenticeCleverClickUp
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations
What Skilljar's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: skilljar.com, skilljar.com/security, skilljar.com/customers, skilljar.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Skilljar's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Skilljar, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Skilljar by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Skilljar is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Skilljar, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.