AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › Alibaba · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Alibaba

7Judge labels
0First choices
7Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Alibaba was named 2 times in Recruiting CRM, where Gem led with 15%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In recruiting crm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Alibaba for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Recruiting CRM and sourcingTalent acquisition0%109 of 111100%2under 10 labels · led by Gem at 15%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

Since September 2026, Alibaba held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Recruiting CRM · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 96 → 106 of 108
Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 106 of 108, unchanged

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Recruiting CRM0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 109 of 111, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Alibaba across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00011
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00011
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative7 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“On Alibaba, stick to "Gold Suppliers" with Trade Assurance escrow—beware basic "Verified Suppliers" or those refusing factory checks.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Recruiting CRM · negative prompt · soft negative
“Never pay outside of Alibaba's Trade Assurance — this is the single biggest red flag.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Recruiting CRM · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Alibaba, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Alibaba was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
LinkedIn Recruiter3 of 71Not among the top eight
Coupa3 of 70Not among the top eight
Faire3 of 70Not among the top eight
Global Sources3 of 70Not among the top eight
SAP Ariba3 of 70Not among the top eight
ThomasNet3 of 70Not among the top eight
Procurify2 of 71Not among the top eight
AliExpress2 of 70Not among the top eight
DHgate2 of 70Not among the top eight
Jaggaer2 of 70Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Alibaba. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 7 answers that named Alibaba and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

globalsources.com3
procurementtactics.com3
seller.alibaba.comYour site3
alibaba.comYour site2
ctis.biz2
dsers.com2
finance-ai-index.com2
guideflow.com2
hiretruffle.com2
shopify.com2

Eighteen of the twenty-three domain citations in answers naming Alibaba came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

alibaba.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Alibaba takes 0% of first choices and Gem takes 15%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “sourcing tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “candidate sourcing tool”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
1,000,000 a month (“alibaba”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
13,583 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 2,016,604 a month
Searches its site ranks for
967,510 · 23,763 in the top three
Sites linking to it
208,189
Paid Google search
5 searches its ads show for, about 52 clicks and $135 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
100+ ads · 78 image, 15 text, 7 video · 100 shown in the last 30 days

First shown August 2022, as Alibaba.com Hong Kong Limited, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 82 in the year, 18 before. 20 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 109 of 111 in Recruiting CRM
Segment leader
15%
Gem
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
7 answers
Its own site cited
in 6 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow Alibaba

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Alibaba is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Find quality Manufacturers, Suppliers, Exporters, Importers, Buyers, Wholesalers, Products and Trade Leads from our award-winning International Trade Site. Import & Export on alibaba.com
For
Buyers
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers

What Alibaba's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: alibaba.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Alibaba's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Alibaba, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Alibaba by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Alibaba is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Alibaba, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at alibaba.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.