Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 60 → 73 of 100
2 categories · Named, not rankedReejig
10Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Reejig was named 4 times in Talent intelligence and 1 other category, where Pin led with 27%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business77 of 104
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market26 of 90
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise26 of 68
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In talent intelligence · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Reejig for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Talent intelligence | Performance and talent management | 0% | 26 of 90 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Pin at 27% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Internal talent marketplace | Performance and talent management | 0% | 49 of 102 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Fuel50 at 47% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Reejig held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Talent intelligence · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 27 → 25 of 80
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 41 → 24 of 63
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Talent intelligence | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 27 → 26 of 90 |
| Internal talent marketpl | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 49 of 102, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Reejig across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Reejig across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative3 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Choose Reejig if workforce planning and internal mobility are the strongest needs.” Perplexity Sonar · Talent intelligence · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Mid-to-large enterprise HCM mobility augmentation” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Internal talent marketpl · direct prompt · alternative
“A major focus on ethical AI and compliance” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Talent intelligence · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Reejig, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Reejig was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Reejig, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Reejig was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Reejig. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 10 answers that named Reejig and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
pin.com6
eightfold.ai4
gartner.com4
metaview.ai4
sapia.ai4
skima.ai4
engagedly.com3
fuel50.com3
guideflow.com3
hackerearth.com3
Thirty-eight of the thirty-eight domain citations in answers naming Reejig came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
reejig.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Reejig takes 0% of first choices and Pin takes 27%.ShowHide
Search and answers
reejig.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Reejig takes 0% of first choices and Pin takes 27%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “talent intelligence platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “talent intelligence platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 590 a month (“reejig”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 10 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 522 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 70 · 6 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 372
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 26 of 90 in talent intelligence
Segment leader
27%
Pin
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 10 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 10 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on reejig.com
293
subdomains included
Content
242
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
9 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 231 | 11 | 2026-09-23 | People analytics, Talent intelligence | |
| Case study | 5 | 2 | 2026-07-31 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 3 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 1 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 1 | 0 | 2022-07-20 | ||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-23Abby rich blog
- 2026-09-23Ai agents for enterprise blog
- 2026-09-22How to build the offer package agent blog
- 2026-09-22How to build a compensation offer approval agent blog
- 2026-09-01How to lead a unified people and agent workforce blog
- 2026-08-31Why every company needs an ai work design team blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page reejig.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Reejig
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Reejig is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Reejig is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The Work Operating System for AI-powered work
- For
- enterprises
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type ISOC 2 Type IIISO 27001GDPR aligned
- Customers named
- WPP
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting
What Reejig's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: reejig.com, reejig.com/security, reejig.com/platform. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Reejig's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Reejig, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Reejig by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Reejig is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Reejig, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.