AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › Quinyx · October 2026 Edition
3 categories · Ranked

Quinyx

29Judge labels
1First choices
4Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Workforce scheduling for enterprise buyers
Rank 90 of 108 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 50% of its 4 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In workforce scheduling · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Quinyx for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Workforce schedulingCore HR and payroll0%90 of 10850%4under 10 labels · led by Deputy at 37%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Workforce management suitesCore HR and payroll0%49 of 780%2under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 17%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Workforce planningWorkforce planning and analytics0%93 of 98100%1under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 37%

Movement

Since September 2026, Quinyx held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Workforce scheduling · by segment

Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 81 of 99, unchanged
Enterprise▼−4Since September 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 6% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 6 → 9 of 122

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Workforce scheduling0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 90 of 108, unchanged
Workforce management sui0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 28 → 49 of 78
Workforce planning0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 93 of 98, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Quinyx across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00101
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00213
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00011
MiniMax M2.501001
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00011

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct8 labelsNone
Paraphrase9 labels1
Comparative5 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative29 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“AI-powered workforce management solution tailored for mid-market to enterprise companies” MiniMax M2.5 · Workforce scheduling · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Some users have reported that Quinyx can be slow and unresponsive, especially when managing large teams.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Workforce planning · negative prompt · soft negative
“Considerations: Likely overkill for smaller mid-market companies” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Workforce scheduling · direct prompt · soft negative
“without being overly enterprise-heavy like Workday or Quinyx” Grok 4.1 Fast · Workforce scheduling · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Quinyx, over the 29 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Quinyx was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Workday Workforce Management16 of 292Not among the top eight
Dayforce14 of 292Not among the top eight
UKG Pro9 of 296Not among the top eight
Deputy8 of 293Not among the top eight
Homebase8 of 292Not among the top eight
Shiftboard7 of 293Not among the top eight
Connecteam7 of 290Not among the top eight
UKG Pro Workforce Management6 of 295Not among the top eight
BambooHR6 of 290Not among the top eight
SAP SuccessFactors6 of 290Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Quinyx. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 29 of the 29 answers that named Quinyx and are not a share of its labels.

Search and answers

quinyx.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Quinyx takes 0% of first choices and Deputy takes 37%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “scheduling tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “employee scheduling software”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
2,400 a month (“quinyx”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
38 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 1,659 a month
Searches its site ranks for
288 · 18 in the top three
Sites linking to it
2,440
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
17 ads · 15 text, 2 image · 0 shown in the last 30 days

First shown February 2024, as Quinyx AB, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 1 in the year, 16 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 90 of 108 in workforce scheduling
Segment leader
37%
Deputy
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
29 answers
Its own site cited
in 29 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on quinyx.com
1,362
subdomains included
Content
417
counted in the table below
Documentation
3
Product · Integration
15 · 4
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog195132026-09-24Workforce planning
News or press15212026-09-22Workforce scheduling
Case study6042026-08-18
Report or ebook4undated
Webinar or virtual event2undated
Glossary or explainer2undated
Conference or event1undated
Podcast or video1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page quinyx.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Quinyx

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Quinyx is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
AI-powered Workforce Management Platform
For
frontline
Certifications
ISO 27001:2022GDPRSOC 2
Hosting
EU/EEAEU onlyUS onlyEU/EEA & US
Customers named
Tory BurchIndigoJ.JillSyscoEmler Swim SchoolHMVCoor
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations

What Quinyx's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: quinyx.com, quinyx.com, quinyx.com/pricing, trust.quinyx.com, quinyx.com/solutions/compliance. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Quinyx's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Quinyx, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Quinyx by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Quinyx is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Quinyx, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at quinyx.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.