AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › MicroMentor · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

MicroMentor

40Judge labels
2First choices
3Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Mentoring software for small business buyers
Rank 13 of 77 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 10% of its 10 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of MicroMentor →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In mentoring software · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named MicroMentor for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Mentoring softwareLearning and development2%13 of 7710%10accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, MicroMentor held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Mentoring software · by segment

Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 14 → 8 of 50
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 11 → 12 of 74

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Mentoring software2%2%=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 11 → 13 of 77

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated MicroMentor across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.1 Fast00112
Mistral Small10102
DeepSeek V4 Flash00101
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative8 labelsNone
Budget-constrained14 labels2
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative13 labels3not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative40 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Completely free for small-business owners and entrepreneurs... It's ideal for startups or small companies looking to set up a mentoring program without any cost.” Mistral Small · Mentoring software · budget prompt · first choice
“If you have *zero* budget: Use MicroMentor to run a pilot” Kimi K2 · Mentoring software · budget prompt · alternative
“this is the best zero-cost resource” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Mentoring software · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Great for external advice but limited for structured *internal* company programs.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Mentoring software · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as MicroMentor, over the 40 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and MicroMentor was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
SCORE24 of 408Not among the top eight
Together20 of 401Not among the top eight
Mentorloop19 of 4010Not among the top eight
MentorcliQ18 of 401Not among the top eight
PushFar17 of 405Not among the top eight
Qooper16 of 403Not among the top eight
Chronus16 of 401Not among the top eight
ADPList14 of 400Not among the top eight
GrowthMentor14 of 400Not among the top eight
MentorCruise9 of 400Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named MicroMentor. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 39 of the 40 answers that named MicroMentor and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

growthmentor.com34
adplist.org30
mentorcruise.com18
qooper.io18
g2.com17
capterra.com16
peoplemanagingpeople.com16
group.app15
guideflow.com15
softwareadvice.com15

194 of the 194 domain citations in answers naming MicroMentor came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

micromentor.org is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, MicroMentor takes 2% of first choices and Together takes 28%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “mentoring platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “mentoring program software”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
390 a month (“micromentor”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
3 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 2,679 a month
Searches its site ranks for
482 · 54 in the top three
Sites linking to it
4,339
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
6 ads · 6 text · 0 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2021, as Mercy Corps, verified.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
2%
rank 13 of 77 in mentoring software
Segment leader
28%
Together
First choices
2 across its categories
Named in
40 answers
Its own site cited
in 39 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on micromentor.org
937
subdomains included
Content
233
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog23302026-06-09
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page micromentor.org exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow MicroMentor

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

MicroMentor is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Find a mentor and grow your business, or become a mentor to give back. Join the largest online mentorship network, absolutely free for mentors and entrepreneurs worldwide.
For
entrepreneurs and mentors worldwide
Price stated
absolutely free for mentors and entrepreneurs worldwide micromentor.org
Free plan or trial
Free forever, for everyone micromentor.org
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers

What MicroMentor's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: micromentor.org. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when MicroMentor's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as MicroMentor, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for MicroMentor by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where MicroMentor is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name MicroMentor, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at micromentor.org is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.