| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Online course libraries | Learning and development | 2% | 10 of 95 | 33% | 9 | under 10 labels · led by Udemy Business at 48% | ▲+3Since September 2026: 0% → 3%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Compliance training | Learning and development | 0% | 79 of 92 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Traliant at 22% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Online course libraries | 0% | 3% | ▲+3Since September 2026: 0% → 3%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 42 → 10 of 95 |
| Compliance training | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 79 of 92, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“OpenSesame and Udemy for Business are often the best choices due to their flexibility, strong content libraries, and ease of integration” Mistral Small · Online course libraries · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“*Best for Flexible Content Aggregation*” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Online course libraries · direct prompt · alternative
“Best for Flexible, Curated Content” Kimi K2 · Online course libraries · direct prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“"Aggregators (OpenSesame, Go1) ... Poor quality control, irrelevant content, tech glitches"” Muse Glimmer 30B · Online course libraries · negative prompt · hard negative
“Open Sesame users report websites that take a long time to load or are slow and unresponsive” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Compliance training · negative prompt · soft negative
“Frequently flagged for: Poor quality control, Irrelevant content mixed in, Tech glitches” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Online course libraries · negative prompt · soft negative
“Content quality varies by publisher; more admin work to curate” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Online course libraries · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 32 of the 32 answers that named OpenSesame and are not a share of its labels.
Ninety-five of the 106 domain citations in answers naming OpenSesame came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 382 | 1 | 2026-07-06 | Compliance training | |
| Conference or event | 113 | 0 | 2026-01-08 | ||
| Case study | 54 | 9 | 2026-09-25 | ||
| Template or tool | 5 | 1 | 2026-09-18 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 2 | 1 | 2026-09-10 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 2 | 0 | 2026-03-14 |
As the event pages on opensesame.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
Every page opensesame.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What OpenSesame's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: opensesame.com, opensesame.com/solutions/compliance, opensesame.com/solutions/safety, opensesame.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when OpenSesame's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as OpenSesame, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for OpenSesame by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: