AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › OpenComp Market Pulse · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

OpenComp Market Pulse

4Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
2 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. OpenComp Market Pulse was named 2 times in Pay equity, where Syndio led with 12%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In pay equity · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named OpenComp Market Pulse for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Pay equityCompensation and total rewards2%18 of 730%2under 10 labels · led by Syndio at 12%▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, OpenComp Market Pulse held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Pay equity · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 33 → 42 of 71
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 38 → 16 of 67

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Pay equity0%2%▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 38 → 18 of 73

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated OpenComp Market Pulse across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX10001
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labels1
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Start with Gusto + OpenComp Market Pulse (if using Gusto)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Pay equity · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as OpenComp Market Pulse, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and OpenComp Market Pulse was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Gusto4 of 43Not among the top eight
Compport1 of 40Not among the top eight
Deel Compensation/Pay Equity1 of 40Not among the top eight
HRSoft1 of 40Not among the top eight
HiBob1 of 40Not among the top eight
Lattice Compensate1 of 40Not among the top eight
Payscale1 of 40Not among the top eight
Ravio1 of 40Not among the top eight
Salary.com CompAnalyst1 of 40Not among the top eight
Syndio1 of 40Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named OpenComp Market Pulse. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named OpenComp Market Pulse and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

compensationtools.net4
peoplemanagingpeople.com4
effy.ai3
sourceforge.net3
businesswire.com2
gusto.com2
payscale.com2
salary.com2
trusaic.com2
us.fitgap.com2

Twenty-six of the twenty-six domain citations in answers naming OpenComp Market Pulse came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

opencomp.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, OpenComp Market Pulse takes 2% of first choices and Syndio takes 12%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “pay equity tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “pay equity analysis software”
–
not in the top ten
Organic visits to its site
about 5,524 a month
Searches its site ranks for
1,508 · 32 in the top three
Sites linking to it
363
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
74 ads · 73 text, 1 image · 51 shown in the last 30 days

First shown August 2023, as OpenComp, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 6 in the year, 68 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
2%
rank 18 of 73 in pay equity
Segment leader
12%
Syndio
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
4 answers
Its own site cited
in 4 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on opencomp.com
7,576
subdomains included
Content
59
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
2 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog31undatedPay equity, Compensation management
Glossary or explainer1402024-10-04Compensation management
Case study7undatedPay equity
News or press6undatedPay equity
Conference or event1undatedPay equity

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page opencomp.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as OpenComp Market Pulse

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as OpenComp Market Pulse; a claim can dispute any of them.
Gusto + OpenComp Market Pulse 1

Follow OpenComp Market Pulse

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

OpenComp Market Pulse is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Free plan or trial
Try for Free opencomp.com
Customers named
SimplesensePetFriendlyWavelynxFluxxELEOpticsMosaicBowery ValuationRibbon
Not stated on the pages read
Positioning, who it is for, price, starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting

What OpenComp Market Pulse's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: opencomp.com, opencomp.com/pricing-plans, trust.opencomp.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when OpenComp Market Pulse's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as OpenComp Market Pulse, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for OpenComp Market Pulse by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where OpenComp Market Pulse is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name OpenComp Market Pulse, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at opencomp.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.