Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 22 → 21 of 139
1 category · RankedSkillsDB
22Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Skills intelligence for small business buyers
Rank 31 of 127 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 5 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business21 of 144
0%14 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market31 of 127
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise32 of 99
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
In skills intelligence · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named SkillsDB for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skills intelligence | Performance and talent management | 0% | 31 of 127 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Skills Base at 18% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, SkillsDB held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Skills intelligence · by segment
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 11 → 32 of 117
Enterprise▼−5Since September 2026: 5% → 0%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 5% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 7 → 28 of 92
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skills intelligence | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 11 → 31 of 127 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated SkillsDB across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated SkillsDB across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained11 labelsNone
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative22 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“a flat $100/mo product like SkillsDB can be simpler to budget if you want headcount-independent pricing” Muse Glimmer 30B · Skills intelligence · budget prompt · alternative
“SkillsDB at $100/month is the strongest alternative” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Skills intelligence · budget prompt · alternative
“3. SkillsDB (Best for Growing Teams)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Skills intelligence · budget prompt · alternative
“Best Flat‑Rate Option: SkillsDB” Kimi K2 · Skills intelligence · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SkillsDB, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SkillsDB was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SkillsDB, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SkillsDB was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SkillsDB. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 22 of the 22 answers that named SkillsDB and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
firsthr.app19
cloudassess.com14
g2.com13
guideflow.com12
skills-base.com12
hr-ai-index.com11
hrtechsaas.com11
cxeverywhere.com9
itechguides.com9
pin.com9
119 of the 119 domain citations in answers naming SkillsDB came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
skillsdb.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, SkillsDB takes 0% of first choices and Skills Base takes 18%.ShowHide
Search and answers
skillsdb.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, SkillsDB takes 0% of first choices and Skills Base takes 18%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “skills platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “skills intelligence platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 30 a month (“skillsdb”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 881 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 327 · 4 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 322
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 31 of 127 in skills intelligence
Segment leader
18%
Skills Base
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 22 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 22 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on skillsdb.com
663
subdomains included
Content
157
counted in the table below
Documentation
439
Product · Integration
27 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 93 | 10 | 2026-09-22 | Succession planning, Skills intelligence | |
| Comparison | 35 | 3 | 2026-07-21 | Skills intelligence | |
| Glossary or explainer | 26 | 20 | 2026-09-14 | Skills intelligence, Succession planning | |
| Template or tool | 2 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-22First competency framework 30 day plan blog
- 2026-09-15How to choose competency management software blog
- 2026-09-14Skills gap analysis glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-10Upskilling reskilling glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-08Skills intelligence platforms buyers landscape blog
- 2026-09-07Career pathway glossary or explainer
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page skillsdb.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow SkillsDB
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
SkillsDB is its own company.ShowHide
The company
SkillsDB is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Skills intelligence platform for winning teams
- For
- enterprise HR teams
- Price stated
- $0 skillsdb.com
- Starting price
- null skillsdb.com
- Free plan or trial
- Start free, no credit card. skillsdb.com
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type II CertifiedGDPR CompliantSOC2 Type II certified
- Hosting
- 30+ countries served
- Customers named
- BoeingMavenirDatameticaIMRIHighmarkChange HealthcareAXAGBM
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations
What SkillsDB's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: skillsdb.com, skillsdb.com/pricing, trust.skillsdb.com, skillsdb.com/features/lxp, skillsdb.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SkillsDB's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SkillsDB, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SkillsDB by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where SkillsDB is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name SkillsDB, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.