AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › AG5 · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

AG5

24Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Skills intelligence for small business buyers
Rank 28 of 127 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 8 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In skills intelligence · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named AG5 for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Skills intelligencePerformance and talent management0%28 of 1270%8under 10 labels · led by Skills Base at 18%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, AG5 held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Skills intelligence · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 7 of 139, unchanged
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 38 → 28 of 117
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 21 → 27 of 92

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Skills intelligence0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 38 → 28 of 127

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated AG5 across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00101
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash02002
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K200202
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.501001
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labels1
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative11 labelsNone
Budget-constrained5 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative24 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Strong for audit-ready compliance and tracking certifications/qualifications” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Skills intelligence · direct prompt · alternative
“Skills management and gap tracking - Good for small to mid-sized teams” MiniMax M2.5 · Skills intelligence · budget prompt · alternative
“Great for regulated industries (healthcare, manufacturing).” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Skills intelligence · comparative prompt · alternative
“AG5 is a solid budget-friendly alternative” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Skills intelligence · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as AG5, over the 24 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and AG5 was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Skills Base20 of 2413Not among the top eight
iMocha11 of 240Not among the top eight
MuchSkills10 of 242Not among the top eight
Gloat7 of 241Not among the top eight
Kahuna7 of 240Not among the top eight
Eightfold AI6 of 240Not among the top eight
SkillsDB6 of 240Not among the top eight
TalentLMS5 of 243Not among the top eight
TalentGuard5 of 242Not among the top eight
365Talents5 of 241Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named AG5. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 24 of the 24 answers that named AG5 and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

firsthr.app20
guideflow.com13
g2.com11
cxeverywhere.com10
fuel50.com9
goskills.com9
bryq.com8
inop.ai8
skillpanel.com8
skywork.ai8

104 of the 104 domain citations in answers naming AG5 came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

ag5.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, AG5 takes 0% of first choices and Skills Base takes 18%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “skills platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “skills intelligence platform”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
480 a month (“ag5”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
50 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 69,476 a month
Searches its site ranks for
3,859 · 242 in the top three
Sites linking to it
2,832
Paid Google search
1 searches its ads show for, about 6 clicks and $389 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
21 ads · 13 text, 5 video, 3 image · 18 shown in the last 30 days

First shown January 2023, as AG5 B.V., verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 9 in the year, 12 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 28 of 127 in skills intelligence
Segment leader
18%
Skills Base
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
24 answers
Its own site cited
in 24 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on ag5.com
3,519
subdomains included
Content
573
counted in the table below
Documentation
200
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Template or tool26702025-05-07
Blog20612026-09-08Workforce planning, Performance management
Case study3702026-05-28
Webinar or virtual event2302026-03-05Workforce planning
Glossary or explainer1932026-09-04
Report or ebook1012026-07-03HRIS and HCM platforms
Comparison902025-09-01
Conference or event202026-04-22

Most recent

Events in person

Last twelve months

As the event pages on ag5.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page ag5.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow AG5

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

AG5 is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
The Only Plug-and-Play Skills Management Software
For
Frontline Enterprise
Free plan or trial
book a free demo ag5.com
Customers named
KLM CargoAdientGKD GroupCoorsTekBuschJDE Peet’sIntersnackCérélia
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting

What AG5's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: ag5.com, ag5.com/pricing, ag5.com/tag/compliance, ag5.com/case-studies, ag5.com/tag/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when AG5's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as AG5, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for AG5 by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where AG5 is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name AG5, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at ag5.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.