Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 47 of 84, unchanged
1 category · Named, not rankedMonday Agents
2Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
2 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Monday Agents was named 1 time in AI recruiting assistants, where Manatal led with 31%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market48 of 90
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprise45 of 76
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In ai recruiting assistants · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Monday Agents for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI recruiting assistants | Talent acquisition | 0% | 48 of 90 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Manatal at 31% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Monday Agents held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · AI recruiting assistants · by segment
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 43 of 74, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI recruiting assistants | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 48 of 90, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Monday Agents across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Monday Agents across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative2 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“monday agents (end-to-end) suited for mid-sized teams” Grok 4.1 Fast · AI recruiting assistants · scale prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Monday Agents, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Monday Agents was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Monday Agents, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Monday Agents was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Monday Agents. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 2 answers that named Monday Agents and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
greenhouse.com2
monday.comYour site2
qureos.com2
technologyadvice.com2
zapier.com2
aihr.com1
asymbl.com1
cake.me1
christianandtimbers.com1
clearcompany.com1
Thirteen of the fifteen domain citations in answers naming Monday Agents came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
monday.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Monday Agents takes 0% of first choices and Manatal takes 31%.ShowHide
Search and answers
monday.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Monday Agents takes 0% of first choices and Manatal takes 31%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “ai recruiter”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best ai recruiter”
–
not in the top ten
- Organic visits to its site
- about 691,961 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 66,810 · 3,856 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 73,994
- Paid Google search
- 7 searches its ads show for, about 26 clicks and $164 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 48 of 90 in AI recruiting assistants
Segment leader
31%
Manatal
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 2 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 2 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on monday.com
11,054
subdomains included
Content
3,300
counted in the table below
Documentation
6,905
Product · Integration
97 · 30
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 2,598 | 0 | 2025-12-23 | ||
| Template or tool | 189 | 0 | 2026-02-18 | ||
| Comparison | 169 | 5 | 2026-08-31 | ||
| Case study | 138 | 7 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| News or press | 61 | 0 | 2026-06-09 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 53 | 3 | 2026-09-15 | ||
| Conference or event | 51 | 5 | 2026-08-15 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 32 | 1 | 2026-07-13 | ||
| Report or ebook | 8 | 0 | 2026-01-26 | ||
| Podcast or video | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Hitachi construction machinery case study
- 2026-09-15What is the primary treatment modality of modafinil 200 mg tablets o9NvYpAw1fo7jWk glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-04Case study from scattered leads to a connected fulfillment pipeline yb4ufnNyp201397 case study
- 2026-09-03What is agentic ai crm glossary or explainer
- 2026-08-31Lovable alternatives comparison
- 2026-08-24Food folk case study
Events in person
Upcoming
- October 28, 2026Elevate 2026: NYCJavits Center, New York, USA · hosts
- November 24, 2026Elevate 2026: EMEAExcel London - Royal Victoria Dock, 1 Western Gateway, London E16 1XL, UK, London, UK · hosts
Last twelve months
- November 6, 2025Elevate 2025Sydney · took part
- October 22, 2025 to October 23, 2025Elevate 2025London · took part
As the event pages on monday.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page monday.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Monday Agents
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Monday Agents; a claim can dispute any of them.
monday agents 1
Follow Monday Agents
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Monday Agents is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Monday Agents is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The AI work platform for people & agents
- For
- teams
- Price stated
- Pricing monday.com
- Free plan or trial
- No credit card needed ✦ Unlimited time on Free plan monday.com
- Certifications
- GDPR complianceISO certifiedAICPA SOCHIPAAISO/IEC 27001ISO/IEC 27018HIPAA compliance
- Customers named
- McDonald'sCanvaVMLMotorolaAlex Boulder, Director of OperationsChinburg PropertiesChobani AustraliaGrill'd
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, integrations, hosting
What Monday Agents's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: monday.com, monday.com/pricing, trust.monday.com, monday.com/features/files, monday.com/w/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Monday Agents's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Monday Agents, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Monday Agents by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Monday Agents is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Monday Agents, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.