Calendly vs ModernLoop
Three of fourteen models named Calendly first on the direct prompt; four named ModernLoop. Calendly was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and ModernLoop by thirteen and Calendly carries 55 labels and ModernLoop 26, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in seven categories this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the interview scheduling page.
By framing
CalendlyFirst choices, of fourteen modelsModernLoop
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Calendly and ModernLoop were named in the same answer seventy-two times, of the 249 answers naming Calendly and the 88 naming ModernLoop. In those answers ModernLoop took the first choice fifteen times and Calendly seventeen.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | | ||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | | |
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | | ||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | | ||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
Calendly ModernLoop first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Calendly on the left and ModernLoop on the right.The direct prompt
Calendly first, ModernLoop not the choice
3 of 14 modelsModernLoop was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.ModernLoop first, Calendly an alternative
4 of 14 modelsCalendly was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
1 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
6 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Calendly41%#1 of 15ModernLoop0%#14 of 15Calendly20%#1 of 12ModernLoop9%#4 of 12What the models said about Calendly
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“Avoid using general-purpose tools (like Doodle or basic free tiers of Calendly) for serious hiring workflows” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Calendly (Specifically for large Enterprise/Tech sectors): ... it is notably banned by Amazon for employee use. This is due to concerns over data leakage” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Calendly - Very popular and widely used. Has a free tier for basic use... For very small teams (1-5 people): Calendly's free plan or BizBot's free tier should suffice” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“Most companies with limited budgets start with Calendly's free plan and upgrade only when they need team scheduling features” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice
“1. Calendly - Best for: Sales teams, recruiters, consultants, and anyone needing to schedule 1:1 or team meetings.” Mistral Small · comparative prompt · first choice
What the models said about ModernLoop
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“they're overkill for a budget-conscious small company” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“you don't need to spend thousands of dollars on enterprise-grade recruiting software like GoodTime or ModernLoop” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“My default pick: ModernLoop—if you’re a mid-market B2B company with a dedicated recruiting team and regular multi-person interview panels.” GPT-6 Luna · direct prompt · first choice
“Platforms like candidate.fyi, GoodTime, and ModernLoop are specifically designed to handle complex, multi-stage panel loops” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“Top Pick: ModernLoop ... widely considered the gold standard for mid-market recruiting teams” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.