| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR AI assistants | Onboarding and employee experience | 12% | 2 of 142 | 10% | 31 | accepted challenger | ▲+5Since September 2026: 6% → 11%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| HR help desk and case management | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 35 of 108 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Zoho Desk at 19% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR AI assistants | 6% | 11% | ▲+5Since September 2026: 6% → 11%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 4 → 2 of 142 |
| HR help desk | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 27 → 35 of 108 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Leena AI is the mid-market default for HR chatbots, sitting in Slack or Teams and handling policy lookups” Claude Haiku 4.5 · HR AI assistants · direct prompt · first choice
“Integration needs: Leena AI offers the most integrations (200+)... dedicated HR assistant (Leena AI)” MiniMax M2.5 · HR AI assistants · comparative prompt · first choice
“Leena AI leads the agentic HR service desk that answers employee questions around the clock” Muse Glimmer 30B · HR AI assistants · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose Leena AI if: You need enterprise-grade workflow automation and multilingual support” GLM 4.7 FlashX · HR AI assistants · comparative prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Some of the assistants to avoid include Leena AI and Workativ, as they may not be suitable for specific HR needs.” Llama 4 Maverick · HR AI assistants · negative prompt · hard negative
“1,000-user minimum and effectively starts around $150/employee/year ... likely overkill for most mid-sized companies” DeepSeek V4 Flash · HR AI assistants · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“tools such as Leena AI or Workativ for the specific enterprise need discussed in the source” Perplexity Sonar · HR AI assistants · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 88 of the 90 answers that named Leena AI and are not a share of its labels.
293 of the 293 domain citations in answers naming Leena AI came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 448 | 6 | 2026-09-18 | Employee onboarding, Performance management | |
| Podcast or video | 37 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 14 | 0 | 2026-01-28 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 13 | 2 | 2026-09-17 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 13 | 0 | 2025-10-24 | ||
| Template or tool | 4 | undated | Employee onboarding | ||
| Conference or event | 1 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 1 | undated | |||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
Every page leena.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name employee onboarding (32); 0 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Leena AI's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: leena.ai, leena.ai/pricing, trust.leena.ai, leena.ai/platform, leena.ai/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Leena AI's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Leena AI, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Leena AI by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
Leena AI is among the products AI models recommend first in HR AI assistants this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.