Small business=heldSince September 2026: 21% → 21%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
21%from 21% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 2 of 108, unchanged
1 category · RankedMeBeBot
40Judge labels
21First choices
0Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
21% in HR AI assistants for mid-market buyers
Rank 1 of 142 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 18 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of MeBeBot →By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
Small business2 of 121
20%18 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market1 of 142
21%18 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise23 of 110
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
In hr ai assistants · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named MeBeBot for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR AI assistants | Onboarding and employee experience | 21% | 1 of 142 | 0% | 18 | accepted challenger | ▲+12Since September 2026: 10% → 22%, +12 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, MeBeBot held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · HR AI assistants · by segment
Mid-market▲+12Since September 2026: 10% → 22%, +12 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
22%from 10% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 1 pointRank 2 → 1 of 124
Enterprise▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 5 → 17 of 94
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR AI assistants | 10% | 22% | ▲+12Since September 2026: 10% → 22%, +12 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 2 → 1 of 142 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated MeBeBot across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated MeBeBot across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase23 labels17
Comparative9 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained6 labels4
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 label1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative40 labels in all, every segment counted; 21 of the 24 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“MeBeBot if you have global/multilingual teams and want answers curated for accuracy” MiniMax M2.5 · HR AI assistants · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“MeBeBot (Best Overall & Fastest Time-to-Value)... is the strongest choice.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · HR AI assistants · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“MeBeBot - Best for small to mid-sized companies wanting quick deployment.” Llama 4 Maverick · HR AI assistants · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“MeBeBot is the most commonly cited sub-$5 per user/month SMB HR chatbot” Muse Glimmer 30B · HR AI assistants · budget prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as MeBeBot, over the 40 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and MeBeBot was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as MeBeBot, over the 40 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and MeBeBot was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named MeBeBot. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 40 of the 40 answers that named MeBeBot and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
workativ.com23
wonderchat.io22
mebebot.comYour site21
moveworks.com21
peoplemanagingpeople.com20
herothemes.com19
miniloop.ai19
wotnot.io19
intervue.io15
chatbot.com11
169 of the 190 domain citations in answers naming MeBeBot came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where MeBeBot stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where MeBeBot stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “hr ai assistants”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “ai assistant for hr teams”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 70 a month (“mebebot”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 36 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 31 · 1 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 428
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
21%
rank 1 of 142 in HR AI assistants
First choices
21
across its categories
- Named in
- 40 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 40 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on mebebot.com
463
subdomains included
Content
447
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 353 | 42 | 2026-09-23 | Employee onboarding, People analytics | |
| News or press | 30 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 23 | 6 | 2026-09-18 | HRIS and HCM platforms | |
| Case study | 16 | 1 | 2026-09-01 | ||
| Podcast or video | 8 | 0 | 2026-01-05 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 7 | 0 | 2026-05-29 | ||
| Conference or event | 4 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 3 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 3 | 2 | 2026-09-25 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-25Compliant answers internal knowledge buyer checklist template or tool
- 2026-09-23Ai employee chatbots compliance productivity blog
- 2026-09-21Best ai notification tools employee comms blog
- 2026-09-189 things to know about ai chatbots for microsoft teams blog
- 2026-09-18Ai employee chatbots compliance controls blog
- 2026-09-18Ai employee chatbots hr it mid market blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page mebebot.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow MeBeBot
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
MeBeBot is its own company.ShowHide
The company
MeBeBot is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI Employee Assistant for Teams & Slack
- For
- mid-market and enterprise organizations
- Price stated
- $1.50–$3.50 PEPM mebebot.com
- Starting price
- 1.50 mebebot.com
- Free plan or trial
- Trial Instance mebebot.com
- Integrations claimed
- 3 mebebot.com/case-studies · 19 mebebot.com/integrations pages disagree
- Certifications
- SOC II-certifiedEEOC-reviewedSOC 2 Type 2 certifiedGDPR-compliant
- Customers named
- e2openEpicorIGTCrowdStreetCare.comTerminalZiff DavisAbrigo
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting
What MeBeBot's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: mebebot.com, mebebot.com/pricing, mebebot.com/case-studies, mebebot.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when MeBeBot's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as MeBeBot, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for MeBeBot by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where MeBeBot is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name MeBeBot, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where MeBeBot is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where MeBeBot is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideAI models recommend MeBeBot first in HR AI assistants this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.