Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 38 → 41 of 62
3 categories · Named, not rankedisolved
6Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. isolved was named 3 times in Benefits administration and 2 other categories, where Gusto led with 20%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market43 of 67
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprise44 of 61
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In benefits administration · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named isolved for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benefits administration | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 43 of 67 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Gusto at 20% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Compensation management | Compensation and total rewards | 0% | 105 of 140 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Pave at 18% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Succession planning | Performance and talent management | 0% | 83 of 93 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 28% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, isolved held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Benefits administration · by segment
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 39 of 52, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benefits administration | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 38 → 43 of 67 |
| Compensation management | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 105 of 140, unchanged |
| Succession planning | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 83 of 93, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated isolved across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated isolved across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“isolved offers a stackable employee benefits platform” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Benefits administration · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as isolved, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and isolved was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as isolved, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and isolved was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named isolved. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 6 answers that named isolved and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
g2.com5
hibob.com4
softwareadvice.com4
appsruntheworld.com3
bamboohr.com3
firsthr.app3
gartner.com3
learn.g2.com3
peoplemanagingpeople.com3
capterra.com2
Thirty-three of the thirty-three domain citations in answers naming isolved came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on isolvedhcm.com
978
subdomains included
Content
790
counted in the table below
Documentation
3
Product · Integration
0 · 16
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 329 | 24 | 2026-09-24 | Payroll software, People analytics | |
| Case study | 91 | 7 | 2026-08-05 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 89 | undated | People analytics, Employee onboarding | ||
| News or press | 88 | undated | Talent intelligence, People analytics | ||
| Report or ebook | 67 | undated | Benefits administration, Workforce management sui | ||
| Conference or event | 53 | 19 | 2026-11-05 | Workforce management sui | |
| Glossary or explainer | 52 | undated | HRIS and HCM platforms, Payroll software | ||
| Comparison | 13 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 8 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-11-05People heroes tour orange county conference or event
- 2026-10-27People heroes tour dallas conference or event
- 2026-10-27Pre employment background check process conference or event
- 2026-10-21Cybersecurity awareness conference or event
- 2026-10-14401k plan administration conference or event
- 2026-10-07People heroes tour boston conference or event
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page isolvedhcm.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow isolved
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
isolved is its own company.ShowHide
The company
isolved is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Online HR & payroll solution designed to improve HR functions
- For
- HR teams
- Price stated
- Request a price quote isolvedhcm.com/pricing-request
- Customers named
- Phil Long DealershipsAcopian Technical CompanyZions BankPaymintChiledaChristensen EssigCommunity Interface Services
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What isolved's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: isolvedhcm.com, isolvedhcm.com/pricing-request, isolvedhcm.com/benefits/compliance. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when isolved's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as isolved, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for isolved by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where isolved is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name isolved, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.