Small businessgoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsNot ranked
1 category · Named, not rankedHubstaff Talent
6Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Hubstaff Talent was named 2 times in Internal talent marketpl, where Fuel50 led with 47%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business66 of 129
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market25 of 102
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In internal talent marketpl · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Hubstaff Talent for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internal talent marketplace | Performance and talent management | 0% | 25 of 102 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Fuel50 at 47% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Hubstaff Talent held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Internal talent marketpl · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 82 → 23 of 93
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internal talent marketpl | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 82 → 25 of 102 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Hubstaff Talent across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Hubstaff Talent across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative4 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“zero-commission platforms (like *Contra* or *Hubstaff Talent*)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Internal talent marketpl · negative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Hubstaff Talent, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Hubstaff Talent was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Hubstaff Talent, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Hubstaff Talent was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Hubstaff Talent. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 6 answers that named Hubstaff Talent and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
g2.com4
upwork.com3
business.com2
capterra.com2
cxeverywhere.com2
fiverr.com2
fueler.io2
hiringmanager.net2
marketerhire.com2
secondtalent.com2
Twenty-three of the twenty-three domain citations in answers naming Hubstaff Talent came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
hubstaff.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Hubstaff Talent takes 0% of first choices and Fuel50 takes 47%.ShowHide
Search and answers
hubstaff.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Hubstaff Talent takes 0% of first choices and Fuel50 takes 47%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “talent marketplaces”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “internal talent marketplace”
–
not in the top ten
- Organic visits to its site
- about 100,097 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 20,617 · 552 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 12,509
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 25 of 102 in internal talent marketpl
Segment leader
47%
Fuel50
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 6 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 5 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on hubstaff.com
1,574
subdomains included
Content
742
counted in the table below
Documentation
555
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 602 | 4 | 2026-09-11 | Workforce planning, Payroll software | |
| Comparison | 81 | 0 | 2026-03-23 | ||
| Case study | 25 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 16 | 0 | 2024-02-09 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 9 | 4 | 2026-07-22 | ||
| Template or tool | 6 | 0 | 2018-01-16 | ||
| Report or ebook | 2 | 1 | 2026-08-14 | ||
| Podcast or video | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-11Idle time tracking software blog
- 2026-09-07Unusual employee activity tracking blog
- 2026-08-14Time reporting software | Hubstaff report or ebook
- 2026-08-04Time off leave management blog
- 2026-07-29Time tracking with screenshots software | Hubstaff blog
- 2026-07-22Hubstaff reporting webinar webinar or virtual event
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page hubstaff.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Hubstaff Talent
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Hubstaff Talent; a claim can dispute any of them.
Freelancer.com / Hubstaff Talent 1
Follow Hubstaff Talent
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Hubstaff Talent is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Hubstaff Talent is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Free plan or trial
- Free 14-day trial hubstaff.com
- Integrations claimed
- 35 hubstaff.com
- Certifications
- GDPRSOC 2 Type IIHIPAALGPD and CCPASOC 2CCPA
- Hosting
- USGlobal
- Customers named
- AhrefsInstacartGroupon®CENTURY 21ClearDeskOneLMSRingAffordable Staff
- Not stated on the pages read
- Positioning, who it is for, price, starting price
What Hubstaff Talent's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: hubstaff.com, hubstaff.com/pricing, trust.hubstaff.com, hubstaff.com/customers, hubstaff.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Hubstaff Talent's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Hubstaff Talent, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Hubstaff Talent by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Hubstaff Talent is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Hubstaff Talent, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.