AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › Freelancer.com · October 2026 Edition
3 categories · Ranked

Freelancer.com

69Judge labels
0First choices
52Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Internal talent marketpl for mid-market buyers
Rank 101 of 102 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 53% of its 19 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Freelancer.com →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In internal talent marketpl · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Freelancer.com for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Internal talent marketplacePerformance and talent management0%101 of 10253%19criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Contingent workforce managementWorkforce planning and analytics0%121 of 121100%4under 10 labels · led by VectorVMS at 16%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Skills intelligencePerformance and talent management0%126 of 127100%3under 10 labels · led by Skills Base at 18%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Freelancer.com held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Internal talent marketpl · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 109 → 124 of 125
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 123 → 92 of 93
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 75 of 76, unchanged

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Internal talent marketpl0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 123 → 101 of 102
Contingent workforce man0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 94 → 121 of 121
Skills intelligence0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 158 → 126 of 127

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Freelancer.com across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500011
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash00022
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00123
Mistral Small00123
DeepSeek V4 Flash00123
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00123
Kimi K200022
GLM 4.7 FlashX00123
MiniMax M2.501001
GPT-6 Luna00112
Muse Glimmer 30B00112

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative17 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative51 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative69 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For bidding/contests and broad sourcing: Freelancer” GPT-5.4 mini · Internal talent marketpl · comparative prompt · alternative
“For budget-driven work: Freelancer.com” MiniMax M2.5 · Internal talent marketpl · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Users report spammy job posts, unhelpful support, and verification delays... have more frequent reports of scams, spammy listings, and poor support.respond” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Internal talent marketpl · negative prompt · hard negative
“Overwhelmingly negative Trustpilot scores (~1-2★), fake/outdated job postings... Mitigation: Rarely recommended; use only for low-stakes bids.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Contingent workforce man · negative prompt · hard negative
“its quality issues, fee structure, and reputation problems make it a worse choice than Upwork or Fiverr” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Internal talent marketpl · negative prompt · hard negative
“Low-Barrier Freelance Marketplaces (e.g., Upwork, Fiverr, Freelancer.com)... they present massive risks” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Contingent workforce man · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Freelancer.com, over the 69 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Freelancer.com was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Upwork62 of 6912Not among the top eight
Fiverr61 of 695Not among the top eight
Toptal38 of 696Not among the top eight
Gloat20 of 697Not among the top eight
Eightfold AI18 of 691Not among the top eight
Guru18 of 691Not among the top eight
PeoplePerHour15 of 690Not among the top eight
Contra11 of 690Not among the top eight
Fuel5010 of 692Not among the top eight
Beeline8 of 691Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Freelancer.com. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 69 of the 69 answers that named Freelancer.com and are not a share of its labels.

Search and answers

freelancer.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Freelancer.com takes 0% of first choices and Fuel50 takes 47%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “talent marketplaces”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “internal talent marketplace”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
2,900 a month (“freelancer.com”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
50 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 380,401 a month
Searches its site ranks for
19,270 · 1,201 in the top three
Sites linking to it
43,461
Paid Google search
1 searches its ads show for, about 3 clicks and $25 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
120+ ads · 120 text · 120 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2021, as Freelancer International Pty Ltd, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 20 in the year, 100 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 101 of 102 in internal talent marketpl
Segment leader
47%
Fuel50
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
69 answers
Its own site cited
in 69 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on freelancer.com
10,115
subdomains included
Content
3,039
counted in the table below
Documentation
143
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog2,89982026-09-25
Report or ebook5712026-09-27
Glossary or explainer2202017-08-28
Comparison2102019-06-20
Conference or event1202017-08-29
Podcast or video1002017-08-17
News or press602017-08-29
Template or tool502017-07-13
Case study402017-08-29
Webinar or virtual event302017-08-07
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page freelancer.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Freelancer.com

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Freelancer.com; a claim can dispute any of them.
Freelancer 2Freelancer.com / Hubstaff Talent 1

Follow Freelancer.com

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Freelancer.com is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
world's largest freelance marketplace
For
People looking to hire freelancers or find freelance jobs online
Price stated
Post your job free, compare quotes, and hire top talent today. freelancer.com
Free plan or trial
Post your job free freelancer.com
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers

What Freelancer.com's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: freelancer.com, freelancer.com/jobs/security. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Freelancer.com's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Freelancer.com, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Freelancer.com by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Freelancer.com is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Freelancer.com, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at freelancer.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.