Small business▲+3Since September 2026: 0% → 3%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
3%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 58 → 16 of 125
1 category · Named, not rankedGigged.AI
5Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Gigged.AI was named 2 times in Internal talent marketpl, where Fuel50 led with 47%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business17 of 129
2%3 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market23 of 102
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In internal talent marketpl · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Gigged.AI for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internal talent marketplace | Performance and talent management | 0% | 23 of 102 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Fuel50 at 47% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Gigged.AI held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Internal talent marketpl · by segment
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 15 → 21 of 93
EnterprisegoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsNot ranked
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internal talent marketpl | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 15 → 23 of 102 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Gigged.AI across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Gigged.AI across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labels1
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Gigged.AI (Best for Tech & Project-Based Teams)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Internal talent marketpl · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Gigged.AI, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Gigged.AI was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Gigged.AI, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Gigged.AI was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Gigged.AI. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 5 answers that named Gigged.AI and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
fuel50.com3
gigged.aiYour site3
dynamicbusiness.com2
talentguard.com2
365talents.com1
agyleos.com1
aihr.com1
app.getamsverified.com1
awesomic.com1
clousai.com1
Thirteen of the sixteen domain citations in answers naming Gigged.AI came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on gigged.ai
336
subdomains included
Content
202
counted in the table below
Documentation
27
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 187 | 0 | 2026-06-22 | Internal talent marketpl, Skills intelligence | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 8 | 1 | 2026-07-14 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 3 | undated | |||
| Case study | 2 | 0 | 2023-11-14 | Internal talent marketpl | |
| Podcast or video | 1 | undated | |||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-07-14On demand agents webinar or virtual event
- 2026-06-22The case for repealing ir35 still blog
- 2026-06-18The 40 40 20 workforce blog
- 2026-06-12The 40 40 20 workforce model why you need a new org chart blog
- 2026-06-10The cio guide to claude fable 5 what mythos class ai means for the enterprise blog
- 2026-06-01The cios new mandate why human ai orchestration will define the next five years blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page gigged.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Gigged.AI
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Gigged.AI is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Gigged.AI is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Hire Tech Talent | Orchestrate Human & AI Skills
- For
- enterprise leaders
- Price stated
- PAY PER HIRE; SAAS gigged.ai
- Integrations claimed
- 10000 gigged.ai/partners
- Certifications
- certified cyber essentials badgecertified cyber essentials
- Customers named
- LendInvestEnergy & Utilities IndustryConcentrixV.ShipsAtosIFGLInsightsAggreko
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, free plan or trial, hosting
What Gigged.AI's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: gigged.ai, gigged.ai/case-studies, gigged.ai/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Gigged.AI's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Gigged.AI, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Gigged.AI by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Gigged.AI is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Gigged.AI, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.