Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 12 → 7 of 69
1 category · RankedFunctionly
24Judge labels
4First choices
2Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in Org charts for mid-market buyers
Rank 8 of 95 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 7% of its 15 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Functionly →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business8 of 72
4%5 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market8 of 95
4%15 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise20 of 86
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
In org charts · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Functionly for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Org charts and org design | Workforce planning and analytics | 4% | 8 of 95 | 7% | 15 | accepted challenger | ▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Functionly held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Org charts · by segment
Mid-market▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 17 → 8 of 90
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 11 → 18 of 80
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Org charts | 0% | 4% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 17 → 8 of 95 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Functionly across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Functionly across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase15 labels4
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative24 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“The best organizational design tool for a mid-sized B2B company would be ChartHop or Functionly.” Llama 4 Maverick · Org charts · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend Functionly as the best organizational design tool” Kimi K2 · Org charts · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“consider Orgvue / Functionly if you need deeper simulation or API-first recurring change management” Muse Glimmer 30B · Org charts · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Strong choice if you need strict change management and traceability for org transitions” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Org charts · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Reason for Caution: Extremely Low Customer Support.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Org charts · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Functionly, over the 24 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Functionly was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Functionly, over the 24 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Functionly was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Functionly. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 24 of the 24 answers that named Functionly and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
gitnux.org18
functionly.comYour site12
creately.com9
forbes.com9
hr-ai-index.com9
worldmetrics.org9
zipdo.co9
recruiterslineup.com8
g2.com7
devopsschool.com6
Eighty-four of the ninety-six domain citations in answers naming Functionly came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
functionly.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Functionly takes 4% of first choices and ChartHop takes 30%.ShowHide
Search and answers
functionly.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Functionly takes 4% of first choices and ChartHop takes 30%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “org chart tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “org chart software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,300 a month (“functionly”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 45,770 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 5,408 · 530 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 779
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess1 ads · 1 text · 0 shown in the last 30 days
First shown November 2024, as Functionly Pty Ltd, verified.
On Google's pages: 1
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
4%
rank 8 of 95 in org charts
Segment leader
30%
ChartHop
- First choices
- 4 across its categories
- Named in
- 24 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 24 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on functionly.com
508
subdomains included
Content
83
counted in the table below
Documentation
76
Product · Integration
13 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Podcast or video | 67 | 0 | 2026-06-18 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 5 | 0 | 2025-06-04 | Workforce planning | |
| Case study | 4 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 2 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 2 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 1 | 0 | 2026-04-09 | ||
| Report or ebook | 1 | undated | Workforce planning | ||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-06-18Rethinking how we value people jacob chase podcast or video
- 2026-06-04Influence without authority org design lessons from higher ed marketing with rob zinkan podcast or video
- 2026-05-14Undervaluing your skills and what to do about it with lorena balestrieri podcast or video
- 2026-04-23Why buy in fails and what leaders should do instead with simon davies podcast or video
- 2026-04-09Designing better workshops the power of visual thinking in org design with szil%C3%A1rd strenner conference or event
- 2026-03-12No such thing as perfect org design but there is really bad org design with ann greene podcast or video
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page functionly.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Functionly
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Functionly is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Functionly is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Interactive org design software for operational leaders.
- For
- operational leaders
- Price stated
- Billed monthly; Billed annually Save 50%; Annual Only 10 User seat Min functionly.com/pricing
- Starting price
- 72 functionly.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Free Trial functionly.com
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type II certifiedSOC 2SOCII compliance
- Customers named
- CodeMaxVeritas AutomataCibao Meat Products
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, hosting
What Functionly's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: functionly.com, functionly.com/pricing, trust.functionly.com, functionly.com/use-cases/restructures, functionly.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Functionly's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Functionly, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Functionly by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Functionly is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Functionly, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.