Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 22 → 24 of 97
Facebook · 1 category · Named, not rankedFacebook Jobs
10Judge labels
0First choices
6Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Facebook Jobs was named 5 times in Job advertising, where JobTarget led with 23%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business26 of 102
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market107 of 111
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise75 of 92
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In job advertising · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Facebook Jobs for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Job advertising and distribution | Talent acquisition | 0% | 107 of 111 | 80% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by JobTarget at 23% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Facebook Jobs held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Job advertising · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 96 → 99 of 103
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 72 of 89, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Job advertising | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 96 → 107 of 111 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Facebook Jobs across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Facebook Jobs across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative8 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“scammers use platforms like Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, WhatsApp, and Telegram to promote fake opportunities” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Job advertising · negative prompt · hard negative
“Recruitment scams on social media (Facebook, Instagram, and TikTok) have surged.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Job advertising · negative prompt · hard negative
“deserve extra caution: - LinkedIn - Indeed - Facebook” Perplexity Sonar · Job advertising · negative prompt · soft negative
“Facebook's jobs section is not vetted at all.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Job advertising · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Facebook Jobs, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Facebook Jobs was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Facebook Jobs, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Facebook Jobs was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Facebook Jobs. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 10 answers that named Facebook Jobs and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
consumer.ftc.gov6
joinhomebase.com4
bbb.org3
bestjobsearchapps.com3
firsthr.app3
ftc.gov3
pin.com3
adway.ai2
builtin.com2
g2.com2
Thirty-one of the thirty-one domain citations in answers naming Facebook Jobs came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
facebook.com ranks 3 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Facebook Jobs takes 0% of first choices and JobTarget takes 23%.ShowHide
Search and answers
facebook.com ranks 3 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Facebook Jobs takes 0% of first choices and JobTarget takes 23%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “job advertising platforms”
3
Position for “programmatic job advertising platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 5,400 a month (“facebook jobs”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 980 a month
- Its company's site
- facebook.com shared with Facebook's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 3,412,145,496 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 135,647,781 · 22,797,654 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 34,835,893
- Paid Google search
- 25 searches its ads show for, about 5,121 clicks and $39,318 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 107 of 111 in job advertising
Segment leader
23%
JobTarget
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 10 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 10 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Facebook Jobs
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Facebook Jobs; a claim can dispute any of them.
Facebook 3Facebook (Job Listings feature) 1
Follow Facebook Jobs
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Facebook is the company behind Facebook Jobs.ShowHide
The company
Facebook is the company behind Facebook Jobs.
ShowHideOn record
Company records- Also from Facebook
- Facebook Groups, Facebook Messenger
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Facebook Jobs's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Facebook Jobs, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Facebook Jobs by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Facebook Jobs is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Facebook Jobs, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.