AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › Emtrain · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Emtrain

21Judge labels
2First choices
0Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Compliance training for mid-market buyers
Rank 10 of 92 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 12 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Emtrain →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In compliance training · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Emtrain for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Compliance trainingLearning and development2%10 of 920%12accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Emtrain held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Compliance training · by segment

Small businessgoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsNot ranked
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 9 → 10 of 89
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 7 → 12 of 86

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Compliance training2%2%=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 9 → 10 of 92

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Emtrain across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash02002
Perplexity Sonar02002
Grok 4.1 Fast02002
Mistral Small10001
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick00202
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B01001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase13 labels1
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained3 labels1
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative21 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Emtrain and TechClass are often highlighted for their balance of quality, scalability, and value.” Mistral Small · Compliance training · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Best For: Organizations seeking to use compliance training to actively diagnose and fix toxic workplace culture.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Compliance training · comparative prompt · alternative
“Reputable alternatives often cited positively: Traliant, Emtrain, LRN, Everfi, BizLibrary, Skillsoft” Grok 4.1 Fast · Compliance training · negative prompt · alternative
“Modern, bite-sized, engaging formats; good if culture-building > pure compliance.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Compliance training · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Emtrain, over the 21 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Emtrain was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
NAVEX11 of 212Not among the top eight
Skillsoft Percipio5 of 210Not among the top eight
Everfi4 of 210Not among the top eight
Kantola3 of 210Not among the top eight
LRN3 of 210Not among the top eight
360training2 of 210Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Emtrain. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 21 of the 21 answers that named Emtrain and are not a share of its labels.

Search and answers

emtrain.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Emtrain takes 2% of first choices and Traliant takes 22%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “compliance training platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “compliance training providers”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
720 a month (“emtrain”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
1 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 32,865 a month
Searches its site ranks for
5,968 · 277 in the top three
Sites linking to it
1,612
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
1 ads · 1 text · 1 shown in the last 30 days

First shown July 2026, as John Wiese. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 1 in the year.

On Google's pages: 1

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
2%
rank 10 of 92 in compliance training
Segment leader
22%
Traliant
First choices
2 across its categories
Named in
21 answers
Its own site cited
in 21 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on emtrain.com
1,485
subdomains included
Content
689
counted in the table below
Documentation
2
Product · Integration
49 · 4
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog621112026-09-24Compliance training, Performance management
Conference or event1702024-08-12
Glossary or explainer1502025-09-22
Comparison1102026-03-16Compliance training
Template or tool1102026-03-10
Case study602025-10-30
Report or ebook302018-10-19
News or press302025-11-01
Webinar or virtual event2undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page emtrain.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Emtrain

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Emtrain is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Workforce Intelligence & Compliance Training
For
HR and Compliance leaders
Price stated
Basic Starting at $50 per learner/year*; Standard Starting at $60 per learner/year*; Premium Starting at $75 per learner/year*; CenterStage Library $199 per month, billed monthly. emtrain.com/pricing
Starting price
50 emtrain.com/pricing
Certifications
TRUSTeSOC 2 Type II
Customers named
InvocaOTGOclaroMedical Research GroupGlobal Pharmaceutical CompanyStockXWhirlpoolMemorial Sloan Kettering
Not stated on the pages read
Free plan or trial, integrations, hosting

What Emtrain's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: emtrain.com, emtrain.com/pricing, emtrain.com/concept/trust, emtrain.com/products, emtrain.com/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Emtrain's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Emtrain, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Emtrain by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Emtrain is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Emtrain, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at emtrain.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.