Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 56 of 101, unchanged
2 categories · Named, not rankedEightfold
4Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Eightfold was named 2 times in People analytics and 1 other category, where Crunchr led with 22%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market63 of 114
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprise48 of 79
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In people analytics · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Eightfold for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| People analytics | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 63 of 114 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Crunchr at 22% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Workforce planning | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 64 of 98 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 37% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Eightfold held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · People analytics · by segment
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 43 of 72, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| People analytics | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 63 of 114, unchanged |
| Workforce planning | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 64 of 98, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Eightfold across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Eightfold across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Eightfold, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Eightfold was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Eightfold, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Eightfold was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Eightfold. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 4 answers that named Eightfold and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
avature.net1
bestrecruitingtools.com1
blog.getaura.ai1
cal.com1
candidate.fyi1
eletive.com1
ganintegrity.com1
goodtime.io1
horseflyanalytics.com1
impactwork.io1
Ten of the ten domain citations in answers naming Eightfold came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
eightfold.ai is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Eightfold takes 0% of first choices and Crunchr takes 22%.ShowHide
Search and answers
eightfold.ai is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Eightfold takes 0% of first choices and Crunchr takes 22%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “people analytics platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “people analytics platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Organic visits to its site
- about 53,360 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 4,402 · 346 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 8,807
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 63 of 114 in people analytics
Segment leader
22%
Crunchr
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 4 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 3 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on eightfold.ai
1,800
subdomains included
Content
1,427
counted in the table below
Documentation
216
Product · Integration
29 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 678 | 10 | 2026-09-21 | Talent intelligence, Applicant tracking syste | |
| Glossary or explainer | 631 | undated | Talent intelligence, Succession planning | ||
| News or press | 56 | undated | Talent intelligence, Applicant tracking syste | ||
| Case study | 23 | undated | Talent intelligence | ||
| Conference or event | 17 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 9 | 0 | 2025-09-24 | ||
| Report or ebook | 4 | undated | Talent intelligence | ||
| Comparison | 4 | 0 | 2026-01-12 | ||
| Podcast or video | 3 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 2 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-21Ai hiring laws nyc illinois colorado eu blog
- 2026-09-21How ai bias testing works blog
- 2026-09-21Ai hiring bias myths and receipts blog
- 2026-09-17Candidate evaluation next frontier talent acquisition blog
- 2026-09-09Change exhaustion to competitive edge adaptive workforce blog
- 2026-08-20Ai interviewing military defense public safety blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page eightfold.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name talent intelligence (103); 6 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Eightfold
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Eightfold is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Eightfold is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI Native Talent Intelligence Platform
- For
- HR leaders, recruiters, and people manager
- Certifications
- ISO/IEC 42001 certifiedFedRAMP Moderate authorizedThird-party bias auditsSOC 2 Type II certifiedISO 42001 certifiedFR Moderate AttestedSOC 2 Type IISOC 3
- Customers named
- STMicroelectronicsSalesforceSchniederENTRUST Solutions GroupConstellisCoca-Cola Europacific PartnersArcadisMercado Libre Argentina
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting
What Eightfold's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: eightfold.ai, trust.eightfold.ai, eightfold.ai/products, eightfold.ai/customers, eightfold.ai/company/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Eightfold's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Eightfold, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Eightfold by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Eightfold is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Eightfold, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.