Mid-market▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 11 → 35 of 77
1 category · Named, not rankedClickTime
7Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. ClickTime was named 1 time in Time and attendance, where Clockify led with 12%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market39 of 86
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprise30 of 87
0%6 labels
under the label threshold
In time and attendance · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named ClickTime for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time and attendance | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 39 of 86 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Clockify at 12% | ▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, ClickTime held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Time and attendance · by segment
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 29 of 76, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time and attendance | 4% | 0% | ▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 11 → 39 of 86 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated ClickTime across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated ClickTime across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase6 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best for Deep Financial Planning & Resource Capacity: ClickTime or BigTime” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Time and attendance · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ClickTime, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ClickTime was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ClickTime, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ClickTime was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ClickTime. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 7 answers that named ClickTime and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
learn.g2.com6
g2.com5
jibble.io5
buddypunch.com3
rippling.com3
thedigitalprojectmanager.com3
wrike.com3
bigtime.net2
clicktime.comYour site2
gartner.com2
Thirty-two of the thirty-four domain citations in answers naming ClickTime came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on clicktime.com
854
subdomains included
Content
286
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
98 · 33
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 189 | 10 | 2026-09-28 | Employee engagement surv, Payroll software | |
| Case study | 40 | 1 | 2026-07-30 | ||
| News or press | 27 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 20 | 2 | 2026-09-18 | ||
| Template or tool | 6 | 0 | 2026-03-19 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 3 | 1 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Report or ebook | 1 | 0 | 2026-01-05 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Webinar connections ai mapping webinar or virtual event
- 2026-09-28How clicktime ai maps work to timesheets blog
- 2026-09-28Work types connections account customization blog
- 2026-09-18Bigtime comparison
- 2026-09-18Harvest comparison
- 2026-08-21Capex formula blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page clicktime.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow ClickTime
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
ClickTime is its own company.ShowHide
The company
ClickTime is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Finance-Ready Time Tracking Across Teams at Scale
- For
- finance leaders, controllers, and ops teams
- Price stated
- Plans start at $12 per user per month, with discounts for annual billing and nonprofits. Team and Premier plans add approval workflows and project budgeting. Enterprise pricing is custom. clicktime.com
- Starting price
- 12 clicktime.com
- Integrations claimed
- 50 clicktime.com · 24 clicktime.com/pricing · 5 clicktime.com/case-studies pages disagree
- Certifications
- SOC 2 type IIGDPRCCPADCAA compliantSAS 70 Type II CertificationSOC 2 CompliantGDPR & CCPA CompliantDCAA-compliant
- Hosting
- United States
- Customers named
- Allison WorldwideSalt Branding (now Material+)Nidec Motor CorporationNectarNidecNXP SemiconductorsTop-10 Biotech CorporationTeach For All
- Not stated on the pages read
- Free plan or trial
What ClickTime's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: clicktime.com, clicktime.com/pricing, trust.clicktime.com, clicktime.com/platform/ai, clicktime.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ClickTime's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ClickTime, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ClickTime by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where ClickTime is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name ClickTime, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.