Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 33 → 58 of 71
ADP · 1 category · Named, not rankedADP WorkForce Suite
15Judge labels
1First choices
2Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. ADP WorkForce Suite was named 4 times in Workforce management sui, where Rippling led with 17%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market64 of 78
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise29 of 81
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In workforce management sui · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named ADP WorkForce Suite for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workforce management suites | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 64 of 78 | 50% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 17% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, ADP WorkForce Suite held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Workforce management sui · by segment
EnterprisegoneNot named this edition; 2% in September 2026.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsNot ranked
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workforce management sui | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 33 → 64 of 78 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated ADP WorkForce Suite across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated ADP WorkForce Suite across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labels1
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative8 labels4not counted in share
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“rank Oracle, ADP WorkForce Suite, and UKG Pro as the top-tier leaders” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Workforce management sui · comparative prompt · first choice
“Organizations wanting payroll + WFM in one vendor ecosystem | Scales from SMB to enterprise” Perplexity Sonar · Workforce management sui · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Users have reported it as a "wretched experience" with ongoing problems with payroll, scheduling, and clock in/out functions” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Workforce management sui · negative prompt · hard negative
“some ADP Workforce Suite users note export/import issues and weak interfaces to payroll” GPT-5.4 mini · Workforce management sui · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ADP WorkForce Suite, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ADP WorkForce Suite was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ADP WorkForce Suite, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ADP WorkForce Suite was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ADP WorkForce Suite. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 15 answers that named ADP WorkForce Suite and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
peoplemanagingpeople.com8
guideflow.com7
forbes.com4
nowsta.com4
ukg.com4
calendly.com3
capterra.com3
g2.com3
gitnux.org3
larksuite.com3
Forty-two of the forty-two domain citations in answers naming ADP WorkForce Suite came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Names read as ADP WorkForce Suite
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as ADP WorkForce Suite; a claim can dispute any of them.
ADP Workforce Suite 2ADP Workforce Suite/ADP Workforce Now 1
Follow ADP WorkForce Suite
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
ADP is the company behind ADP WorkForce Suite.ShowHide
The company
ADP is the company behind ADP WorkForce Suite.
ShowHideOn record
Company records- Also from ADP
- ADP 401(k) Premier, ADP Assist, ADP Benefits, ADP Celergo, ADP DataCloud, ADP Employer of Record, ADP Flex, ADP Global and 24 more
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- ADP Workforce Now empowers clients to effectively address business challenges with a flexible, secure and integrated HCM solution that supports the full spectrum of HR needs – from recruitment to retirement and everything in between.
- For
- employees & administrators
- Free plan or trial
- Launch Self-Guided Demo adp.com/what-we-offer/products/adp-workforce-now.aspx
- Customers named
- Light & Wonder, Inc.HopeSourceAPS Materials, Inc.Giorgio ArmaniPhilips Domestic Appliances
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting
What ADP WorkForce Suite's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: adp.com/logins/adp-workforce-now.aspx, adp.com/what-we-offer/products/adp-workforce-now.aspx, uk.adp.com/what-we-offer/products/adp-time-and-workforce.aspx, adp.com/about-adp/data-security/alerts/adp-workforce-software-claims.aspx, adp.com/resources/what-others-say/analyst-reports/ventana-research-workforce-management-suites-2024.aspx. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ADP WorkForce Suite's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ADP WorkForce Suite, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ADP WorkForce Suite by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where ADP WorkForce Suite is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name ADP WorkForce Suite, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.