Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 41 → 38 of 48
ADP GlobalView · 1 category · RankedADP GlobalView Payroll
18Judge labels
6First choices
5Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
11% in Global payroll for enterprise buyers
Rank 34 of 61 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 40% of its 5 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business44 of 55
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market34 of 61
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise4 of 47
11%11 labels
accepted challenger
In global payroll · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named ADP GlobalView Payroll for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Global payroll and employer of record | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 34 of 61 | 40% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Deel at 30% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, ADP GlobalView Payroll held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Global payroll · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 19 of 53, unchanged
Enterprise▼−3Since September 2026: 14% → 11%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
11%from 14% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 4 → 5 of 45
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Global payroll | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 19 → 34 of 61 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated ADP GlobalView Payroll across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated ADP GlobalView Payroll across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase8 labels6
Comparative5 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative5 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative18 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“ADP Global Payroll if you want a more traditional large-vendor option and already use ADP heavily.” GPT-5.4 mini · Global payroll · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“140+ countries, established legacy player, strong compliance” Kimi K2 · Global payroll · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“often criticized for long implementations, opaque quote-only pricing, multi-year lock-ins, and dated interfaces” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Global payroll · comparative prompt · soft negative
“ADP is also a common enterprise consideration, but its global offerings are sized larger” Muse Glimmer 30B · Global payroll · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ADP GlobalView Payroll, over the 18 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ADP GlobalView Payroll was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ADP GlobalView Payroll, over the 18 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ADP GlobalView Payroll was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ADP GlobalView Payroll. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 18 of the 18 answers that named ADP GlobalView Payroll and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
remote.com10
adp.comYour site7
gartner.com6
nativeteams.com6
peoplemanagingpeople.com6
rippling.com6
cxcglobal.com5
deel.com5
forbes.com5
hr.software4
Fifty-three of the sixty domain citations in answers naming ADP GlobalView Payroll came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
adp.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, ADP GlobalView Payroll takes 0% of first choices and Deel takes 30%.ShowHide
Search and answers
adp.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, ADP GlobalView Payroll takes 0% of first choices and Deel takes 30%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “employer of record”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best employer of record”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 50 a month (“adp globalview payroll”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 2 a month
- Its company's site
- adp.com shared with ADP GlobalView's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 13,578,070 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 219,668 · 33,371 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 64,315
- Paid Google search
- 25 searches its ads show for, about 964 clicks and $62,421 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 34 of 61 in global payroll
Segment leader
30%
Deel
- First choices
- 6 across its categories
- Named in
- 18 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 18 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as ADP GlobalView Payroll
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as ADP GlobalView Payroll; a claim can dispute any of them.
ADP Global Payroll 2ADP GlobalView 1ADP GlobalView + Celergo 1
Follow ADP GlobalView Payroll
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
ADP GlobalView is the company behind ADP GlobalView Payroll.ShowHide
The company
ADP GlobalView is the company behind ADP GlobalView Payroll.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- 金融業界向けの給与計算機能
- Hosting
- 140+ countries and territories140+ markets
- Customers named
- Standard CharteredPayPalCoca-Cola European PartnersDellINTUITFour SeasonsBristol Myers SquibbMondelez
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications
What ADP GlobalView Payroll's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: uk.adp.com/resources/insights/global-payroll-fs.aspx, jp.adp.com/resources/insights/global-payroll-fs.aspx, sg.adp.com/what-we-offer/products/adp-global-payroll.aspx, uk.adp.com/what-we-offer/products/adp-global-payroll.aspx, hk.adp.com/what-we-offer/products/adp-global-payroll.aspx. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ADP GlobalView Payroll's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ADP GlobalView Payroll, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ADP GlobalView Payroll by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where ADP GlobalView Payroll is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name ADP GlobalView Payroll, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.