Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 43 of 74, unchanged
2 categories · Named, not rankedAdobe Learning Manager
34Judge labels
2First choices
1Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
6 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Adobe Learning Manager was named 6 times in Learning experience plat and 1 other category, where 360Learning led with 26%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business45 of 76
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market9 of 89
2%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise13 of 62
0%8 labels
under the label threshold
In learning experience plat · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Adobe Learning Manager for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Learning experience platforms | Learning and development | 2% | 9 of 89 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by 360Learning at 26% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Learning management systems | Learning and development | 0% | 18 of 61 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by TalentLMS at 51% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Adobe Learning Manager held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Learning experience plat · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 23 → 9 of 84
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 23 → 13 of 58
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Learning experience plat | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 23 → 9 of 89 |
| Learning management syst | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 31 → 18 of 61 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Adobe Learning Manager across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Adobe Learning Manager across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct14 labelsNone
Paraphrase5 labels2
Comparative9 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative34 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“I'd recommend starting with Adobe Learning Manager if you want a balanced platform” Perplexity Sonar · Learning experience plat · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“a good choice for mid-sized and large organizations, especially those already using Adobe products” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Learning experience plat · direct prompt · alternative
“Best For: Organizations already using Adobe Creative Cloud or Adobe Experience Manager (AEM).” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Learning management syst · comparative prompt · alternative
“Other affordable options include Moodle, Absorb LMS, and Adobe Learning Manager.” Llama 4 Maverick · Learning management syst · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Adobe Learning Manager, over the 34 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Adobe Learning Manager was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Adobe Learning Manager, over the 34 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Adobe Learning Manager was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Adobe Learning Manager. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 34 of the 34 answers that named Adobe Learning Manager and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
learnworlds.com20
goskills.com16
peoplemanagingpeople.com15
docebo.com13
ispring.com12
g2.com11
360learning.com9
learn.g2.com9
guideflow.com8
thinkific.com8
121 of the 121 domain citations in answers naming Adobe Learning Manager came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
adobe.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Adobe Learning Manager takes 2% of first choices and 360Learning takes 26%.ShowHide
Search and answers
adobe.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Adobe Learning Manager takes 2% of first choices and 360Learning takes 26%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “learning experience platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “learning experience platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,000 a month (“adobe learning manager”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 47 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 242,010,966 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 4,156,506 · 1,068,861 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,595,762
- Paid Google search
- 58 searches its ads show for, about 1,090 clicks and $9,855 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 9 of 89 in learning experience plat
Segment leader
26%
360Learning
- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 34 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 34 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on adobe.com
24,667
subdomains included
Content
16,205
counted in the table below
Documentation
6,970
Product · Integration
390 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 13,857 | 0 | 2025-06-01 | ||
| Report or ebook | 1,261 | 0 | 2023-10-01 | ||
| Conference or event | 481 | 0 | 2024-01-01 | ||
| Podcast or video | 217 | 0 | 2023-07-01 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 147 | 0 | 2022-10-01 | ||
| Comparison | 82 | 0 | 2022-01-01 | ||
| Case study | 55 | 0 | 2020-11-01 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 52 | 0 | 2023-02-01 | ||
| Template or tool | 40 | 0 | 2023-04-01 | ||
| News or press | 13 | 0 | 2020-04-01 |
Most recent
- 2025-06-01Power up your productivity with latest adobe illustrator release blog
- 2024-01-01Experience all that summit has to offer conference or event
- 2024-01-01Adobes creative impact shines bright 2023 emmy awards blog
- 2024-01-01Haileybury paves new career pathways adobe acrobat sign blog
- 2024-01-01Ai trends 2024 predictions next wave business innovation blog
- 2024-01-01Adobe introduces major new audio updates premiere pro ahead 2024 sundance film festival blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page adobe.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Adobe Learning Manager
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Adobe Learning Manager is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Adobe Learning Manager is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI-powered LMS
- For
- customer training, partner education, and employee skilling
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type IIFedRAMPISO/IEC 27001:2022
- Hosting
- Amazon Web ServicesAkamaiBrightcove
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, customers
What Adobe Learning Manager's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: business.adobe.com/products/learning-manager/adobe-learning-manager.html, adobe.com, adobe.com/creativecloud/plans.html, trust.adobe.com, adobe.com/products/xmp.html. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Adobe Learning Manager's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Adobe Learning Manager, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Adobe Learning Manager by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Adobe Learning Manager is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Adobe Learning Manager, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.