Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 18 → 15 of 58
1 category · RankedactiPLANS
21Judge labels
2First choices
0Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Leave for small business buyers
Rank 8 of 95 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 6 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business16 of 65
0%14 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market8 of 95
4%6 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise64 of 98
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In leave · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named actiPLANS for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leave and absence management | Core HR and payroll | 4% | 8 of 95 | 0% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by BambooHR at 28% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, actiPLANS held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Leave · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 8 → 13 of 91
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 17 → 53 of 89
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leave | 2% | 2% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 8 of 95, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated actiPLANS across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated actiPLANS across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative8 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained8 labels2
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative1 label1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative21 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Offers a free leave management software that allows employees to check balances and submit requests” Llama 4 Maverick · Leave · negative prompt · first choice
“actiPLANS up to 3 users free or LeaveBoard up to 9 users free is the lowest-risk entry point” Muse Glimmer 30B · Leave · budget prompt · first choice
“Start with LeaveBoard (free up to 9 employees) or actiPLANS (free up to 3 users)” Kimi K2 · Leave · budget prompt · first choice
“Accessibility. It is often the first choice for a team of 5-10 people” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Leave · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as actiPLANS, over the 21 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and actiPLANS was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as actiPLANS, over the 21 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and actiPLANS was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named actiPLANS. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 21 of the 21 answers that named actiPLANS and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
actiplans.comYour site18
forbes.com18
peoplemanagingpeople.com15
guideflow.com13
employsome.com11
attendancebot.com10
firsthr.app8
sourceforge.net8
vacationtracker.io8
fitsmallbusiness.com7
Ninety-eight of the 116 domain citations in answers naming actiPLANS came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
actiplans.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, actiPLANS takes 4% of first choices and BambooHR takes 28%.ShowHide
Search and answers
actiplans.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, actiPLANS takes 4% of first choices and BambooHR takes 28%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “leave management tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “leave management software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 90 a month (“actiplans”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 6,660 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 5,299 · 8 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 638
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
4%
rank 8 of 95 in leave
Segment leader
28%
BambooHR
- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 21 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 21 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on actiplans.com
359
subdomains included
Content
274
counted in the table below
Documentation
6
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 262 | 20 | 2026-09-24 | Leave, Workforce scheduling | |
| Glossary or explainer | 4 | 0 | 2023-10-17 | ||
| Report or ebook | 3 | 0 | 2025-08-29 | ||
| Comparison | 2 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 2 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 1 | 0 | 2023-10-17 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-24Attendance management software blog
- 2026-09-24Attendance tracker apps blog
- 2026-09-24International bereavement leave laws blog
- 2026-09-23Absence management guide blog
- 2026-09-23Vacation accrual rules blog
- 2026-09-23Best employee time off trackers blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page actiplans.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as actiPLANS
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as actiPLANS; a claim can dispute any of them.
ActiPLANS 1ActiPlans 1
Follow actiPLANS
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
actiPLANS is its own company.ShowHide
The company
actiPLANS is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Leave Management System & PTO Tracker with Location Scheduling
- For
- HR & People Teams; Team Leads & Managers; Finance & Payroll; Executives & Leadership; Operations & Staffing; Project Managers
- Price stated
- free plan for up to 3 users with limited functionality, and paid plans start at $1.2 per user per month actiplans.com
- Starting price
- 1.2 actiplans.com
- Free plan or trial
- Free 30-day trial; No credit card required; free plan for 1 to 3 users with limited functionality actiplans.com
- Certifications
- GDPR compliant
- Customers named
- CAAR Canadian Association of Agri-Retailers (CAAR)WebsiteboxMSADeborah Rojas Architecture & Planning
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, hosting
What actiPLANS's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: actiplans.com, actiplans.com/pricing. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when actiPLANS's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as actiPLANS, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for actiPLANS by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where actiPLANS is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name actiPLANS, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.