Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 24 → 40 of 67
1 category · Named, not rankedAbilityScreen
13Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. AbilityScreen was named 3 times in Technical hiring assessm, where HackerRank led with 17%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market42 of 71
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise9 of 43
0%8 labels
under the label threshold
In technical hiring assessm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named AbilityScreen for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technical hiring assessments | Talent acquisition | 0% | 42 of 71 | 33% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by HackerRank at 17% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, AbilityScreen held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Technical hiring assessm · by segment
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 15 → 9 of 41
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technical hiring assessm | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 24 → 42 of 71 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated AbilityScreen across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated AbilityScreen across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative6 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative6 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“or AbilityScreen (realistic tasks)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Technical hiring assessm · negative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“it may not cover all technical roles comprehensively and could be overly complex for some use cases” Mistral Small · Technical hiring assessm · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as AbilityScreen, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and AbilityScreen was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as AbilityScreen, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and AbilityScreen was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named AbilityScreen. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 12 of the 12 answers that named AbilityScreen and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
resources.trueability.com12
codility.com7
hackerrank.com6
testlify.com6
fueler.io4
g2.com4
guideflow.com4
intervue.io4
aihr.com3
codeassess.dev3
Fifty-three of the fifty-three domain citations in answers naming AbilityScreen came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
abilityscreen.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, AbilityScreen takes 0% of first choices and HackerRank takes 17%.ShowHide
Search and answers
abilityscreen.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, AbilityScreen takes 0% of first choices and HackerRank takes 17%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “coding assessment platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “technical assessment platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- not counted (“abilityscreen”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 2 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 3 · 0 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 480
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 42 of 71 in technical hiring assessm
Segment leader
17%
HackerRank
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 12 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 12 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on abilityscreen.com
156
subdomains included
Content
26
counted in the table below
Documentation
12
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comparison | 9 | 9 | 2026-08-26 | ||
| Blog | 6 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 6 | 4 | 2026-08-05 | ||
| Report or ebook | 5 | 5 | 2026-08-07 |
Most recent
- 2026-08-26Data scientist vs ml engineer assessment comparison
- 2026-08-17Concurrent vs sequential assessment delivery comparison
- 2026-08-07Backend engineer assessment guide report or ebook
- 2026-08-05Sre hiring assessment glossary or explainer
- 2026-08-04Qa automation engineer assessment guide report or ebook
- 2026-08-02Devops engineer assessment guide report or ebook
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page abilityscreen.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow AbilityScreen
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
AbilityScreen is its own company.ShowHide
The company
AbilityScreen is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AbilityScreen is the world's first Full Stack Development talent assessment tool. Increase effectiveness by using a live computer environment.
- Hosting
- 20 Global Cloud Regions
- Customers named
- GoogleVMwareElasticSUSEPing IdentityRelativityCanonicalDigitalOcean
- Not stated on the pages read
- Who it is for, price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications
What AbilityScreen's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: abilityscreen.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when AbilityScreen's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as AbilityScreen, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for AbilityScreen by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where AbilityScreen is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name AbilityScreen, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.