Small businessgoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsNot ranked
ZoomInfo · 2 categories · Named, not rankedZoomInfo Talent
5Judge labels
0First choices
2Negative labels
3 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. ZoomInfo Talent was named 3 times in Recruiting CRM and 1 other category, where Gem led with 15%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market99 of 111
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In recruiting crm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named ZoomInfo Talent for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recruiting CRM and sourcing | Talent acquisition | 0% | 99 of 111 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Gem at 15% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Talent intelligence | Performance and talent management | 0% | 51 of 90 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Pin at 27% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, ZoomInfo Talent held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Recruiting CRM · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 52 → 96 of 108
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recruiting CRM | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 52 → 99 of 111 |
| Talent intelligence | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 51 of 90, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated ZoomInfo Talent across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated ZoomInfo Talent across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If you need verified contact details for scale → ZoomInfo” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Recruiting CRM · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best for Sales & Business Development Sourcing: ZoomInfo” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Talent intelligence · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Tools with poor data accuracy (e.g., ZoomInfo Talent)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Recruiting CRM · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ZoomInfo Talent, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ZoomInfo Talent was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ZoomInfo Talent, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ZoomInfo Talent was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ZoomInfo Talent. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 5 answers that named ZoomInfo Talent and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
g2.com2
guideflow.com2
juicebox.ai2
pin.com2
pipeline.zoominfo.comYour site2
accio.com1
betterproductsourcing.com.au1
calendly.com1
contactinfo.com1
copy.ai1
Thirteen of the fifteen domain citations in answers naming ZoomInfo Talent came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
zoominfo.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, ZoomInfo Talent takes 0% of first choices and Gem takes 15%.ShowHide
Search and answers
zoominfo.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, ZoomInfo Talent takes 0% of first choices and Gem takes 15%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “sourcing tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “candidate sourcing tool”
–
not in the top ten
- Its company's site
- zoominfo.com shared with ZoomInfo's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 6,376,738 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,619,653 · 27,435 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 43,935
- Paid Google search
- 17 searches its ads show for, about 96 clicks and $1,140 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 99 of 111 in Recruiting CRM
Segment leader
15%
Gem
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 5 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 3 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as ZoomInfo Talent
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as ZoomInfo Talent; a claim can dispute any of them.
ZoomInfo 1ZoomInfo Talent Solutions 1
Follow ZoomInfo Talent
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
ZoomInfo is the company behind ZoomInfo Talent.ShowHide
The company
ZoomInfo is the company behind ZoomInfo Talent.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Use ZoomInfo Talent to find top talent and companies needing your help with roles, ensuring you identify the right person or partner.
- For
- recruiters
- Certifications
- ZoomInfo Talent Certification
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting, customers
What ZoomInfo Talent's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: university.zoominfo.com/page/zoominfo-talent. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ZoomInfo Talent's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ZoomInfo Talent, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ZoomInfo Talent by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where ZoomInfo Talent is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name ZoomInfo Talent, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.